That's something that a number of people have requested, but has two
drawbacks: It requires lots of programming time to create, and lots of CPU
time.
Hmmm... Not to be a pest, but I'm wondering if this wouldn't actually
IMPROVE performance?
The problem is that it requires going through
In the last 3 day's I've noticed o lot of Address-scans, nearly in
alphabetical order of all the domains hosted on our mailserver.
Those are called a dictionary attack.
IP's from (examples):
207.44.134.48
207.44.142.84
...
IPWhois Lookup:
OrgName:Everyones Internet, Inc.
OrgID:
As best we can tell, no user noticed and the attack was dealt with
and life goes on, said Louis Touton, vice president for the Internet
Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, the Internet's key governing
body.
And what they don't explain is that there is a good reason for that.
Pretty
Hello,
My apologies in advance for the length of this, but I want to be as through
as possible the first time.
The background:
Dell Poweredge 6400,
Imail 6.06
Windows 2000 Server, SP2
Quad Xeon 733 mhz
Declude 1.60, running Virus and Junkmail
McAfee 4.1.60, Dat file 4229
4GB Ram
All
Sounds like a SMTP loop or something.
How many instances of SMTPD32.exe are running?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:Declude.JunkMail-owner;declude.com] On Behalf Of Bill
Kaylor, Domain Mail Administrator
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 9:14 AM
To: [EMAIL
My apologies in advance for the length of this, but I want to be
as through
as possible the first time.
The background:
375,000-400,000 messages per day
Virus scanning over 350,000 E-mails per day on one server will use a lot of
CPU time.
However, if it was working fine before with
1, with cpu load running between 25-35%, usually around 65-70%, with no
issues.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:Declude.JunkMail-owner;declude.com]On Behalf Of Mark Smith
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 9:22 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail]
cpu util is between 25-35%, was around 65-70 before friday, and the server
never had an issue. on access is disabled however. This is the first issue
I have had with this server in over a year. btw, I never see more than 2-3
scan.exe in the processes at any one time, have the limit set to 15,
Make sure the indexing service is disabled. It is a resource hog. M$ has a
bad habit of re-enabling services after service packs etc.
-Patrick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:Declude.JunkMail-owner;declude.com]On Behalf Of Bill Kaylor,
Domain Mail Administrator
While we are on this topic...
Has anybody had experience with a decent content filtering application? Not exactly
spam content filters, but more along the lines of policy-based filters...where a
corporation could estabilsh policies for what types of content to allow their
employees to send
I am working on a web based held message review app that allows customers to
redeliver false positives or delete the spam on their own. I have a test
mailbox set up and a basic info page.
The app is at http://spmareview.argolink.net, the test box is
[EMAIL PROTECTED], pass is demo.
The info page
Thats pretty cool Chuck!
My only suggestion is that you could run the IIS www service on the same box
and run your app on a different port. That would elimanate the need for
another box and shares.
Have a great day!
Rick Davidson
Buckeye Internet Services
www.buckeyeweb.com
440-953-1900
-
-
Again, this is something that we are looking into, but we just haven't made
any final decisions about.
Thank you, Scott. I can't ask for much more than that.
Dave
--
David M. Delbridge
President CEO
Circa 3000
ColdFusion Hosting
http://www.circa3k.com
775-832-2445
---
[This E-mail was
I think the site is http://spamreview.argolink.net.
Darn keyboard virus got ya.
John Tolmachoff
IT Manager, Network Engineer
RelianceSoft, Inc.
Fullerton, CA 92835
www.reliancesoft.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:Declude.JunkMail-owner;declude.com] On Behalf Of
LOL. :-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:Declude.JunkMail-owner;declude.com]On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Looking for feedback
One of these days i'll take a typing class.
I'd like to make a blacklist, which makes more sense, blacklisting
[EMAIL PROTECTED], which will probably change, the ip address, which will
probably change, or just domain? i.e. bigdeals.com. I'd run this
list as a
weight of 10 or more to push the limit.
I'm so happy so far with this,
When I sit here and read this list, I realize that I know very little about
blocking spam.
How can I use some of the commented out test to better stop spam and be less
likely to stop legitimate email with poorly configured mail servers and dns
servers?
Is there something more I can do with the
I would like to be able to check for the number of
recipients using some sort of test.
This is something that we have been giving some thought to, as well as the
number of invalid recipients. It will likely get added to an upcoming release.
-Scott
---
[This E-mail was
How can I use some of the commented out test to better stop spam
and be less likely to stop legitimate email with poorly configured
mail servers and dns servers?
Is there something more I can do with the tests that come active
by default?
A few things you may want to do is read the
Great! Thanks.
Philip Butler
Internal Systems Engineer
Region VI ESC
phone 936.435.2503
fax 936.295.1447
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:Declude.JunkMail-owner;declude.com]On Behalf Of Tom
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 7:24 PM
To: [EMAIL
Title: Nachricht
In the
last 3 day's I've noticed o lot of Address-scans, nearly in alphabetical order
of all the domains hosted on our mailserver.
IP's from
(examples):207.44.134.48207.44.142.84...IPWhois
Lookup:OrgName: Everyones Internet,
Inc.OrgID: EVRYNetRange:
207.44.128.0 -
21 matches
Mail list logo
