I'm sure Scott will correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe you need to set
everything to Ignore for her customer.junkmail file.
That's the recommended way to set it up if the user doesn't want any scanning.
However, even if the WARN action is used for all tests, the mail shouldn't
get held.
Hi,
http://www.informationweek.com/story/IWK20021115S0018
After reading this article, I changed our setup to weight the blacklist
to 7 and delete email at weight20. This waters down the blacklist a bit
but removes the reliance...anyone else doing the same or similar?
regards,
http://www.informationweek.com/story/IWK20021115S0018
After reading this article, I changed our setup to weight the blacklist
to 7 and delete email at weight20.
Which blacklist? What was it set to before you read that article? Why did
you change it after reading that article?
SPAM,
Monday, November 18, 2002 you wrote:
S After reading this article, I changed our setup to weight the
S blacklist to 7 and delete email at weight20. This waters down the
S blacklist a bit but removes the reliance...anyone else doing the
S same or similar?
I think I understand what
The blacklist is the one generated by killlistgen. We were going to
delete mail based on it...now we downgraded to warn and added to
weighting so most do not get thru.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Monday, November
John,
This is a little off topic, but I've found these guys to be good at quick-registering
domain names:
http://www.snapnames.com/
Their technology and service seems sound. They also have a domain protection service,
but I've not used it.
Dan
On Thursday, November 14, 2002 12:58, John
