RE: [Declude.JunkMail] FW: Filters

2002-11-29 Thread malcolm
Thanks eddie! Can a weight be added to these tests? if so in the normal format? Regards -- Original Message -- From: "eddie pang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 18:00:49 -1000 >e.g. >HEADERS50 CONTAINS

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] FW: Filters

2002-11-29 Thread eddie pang
This example is used to remove s*pam with korean characters in emails, contributed to me by Heinrich. e.g. HEADERS 50 CONTAINSeuc-kr HEADERS 50 CONTAINSks_c eddie :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf O

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Displaying Message weight in the header

2002-11-29 Thread eddie pang
Add a %WEIGHT% into the header. e.g. XINHEADER X-Spam-Tests-Failed: %WEIGHT% %TESTSFAILED% eddie :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of malcolm Sent: Friday, November 29, 2002 5:38 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] D

[Declude.JunkMail] Displaying Message weight in the header

2002-11-29 Thread malcolm
Hi, Is it possible to display the final weight of the message in the header Regards, Malcolm --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROT

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] FW: Filters

2002-11-29 Thread malcolm
Is there a test like this for headers? Regards -- Original Message -- From: "R. Scott Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 19:26:15 -0500 > >>spaces are not allowed. > >Spaces are actually fine in the filters; the

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] FW: Filters

2002-11-29 Thread R. Scott Perry
spaces are not allowed. Spaces are actually fine in the filters; the problem is that you can't have spaces before or after what you are filtering. For example, you can have: BODY 100 CONTAINS Foreign Liaison Officer of the board of trustee of RWA Agency ( Relief West Africa) but, that woul

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] FW: Filters

2002-11-29 Thread Alex Artigues
Actually John the answer is yes it can contain an exact phrase. In Eddies example if the message body contained EXACTLY "Foreign Liaison Officer of the board of trustee of RWA Agency ( Relief West Africa)" then it would fail the filter. If it only contained "Foreign Liason" then it wouldn't fail. T

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] FW: Filters

2002-11-29 Thread eddie pang
Better yet, maybe if it was stated in the documentation, a search would not be needed. Nor would a email of this question would have materialized. Eddie Pang. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff Sent: Friday, November 29, 2002

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] FW: Filters

2002-11-29 Thread John Tolmachoff
A search of the archives would show that this has been asked before and the answer is no, spaces are not allowed. Declude is working on possibly changing this. John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA IT Manager, Network Engineer RelianceSoft, Inc. Fullerton, CA 92835 www.reliancesoft.com -Original Messa

[Declude.JunkMail] FW: Filters

2002-11-29 Thread eddie pang
Do the filters have to be a single word, or can it contains a exact phrase? e.g. BODY 100 CONTAINS Foreign Liaison Officer of the board of trustee of RWA Agency ( Relief West Africa) Thanks, Eddie :) --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] -

[Declude.JunkMail] Another skirmish in the arms race

2002-11-29 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
Apparently I'm slow to get this, but since November 13th, there has been spam which includes this footer (which I've deliberately mangled with ** to avoid anyone else's text filters): This message passed through ANTI**SPAMCENTER filter. If this is a S**PAM - it's imperative that you let us know. Y

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Free or Freedom

2002-11-29 Thread Madscientist
Suggestion: Is it possible to provide a special wildcard character that matches whitespace and punctuation? _M On Fri, 2002-11-29 at 08:23, R. Scott Perry wrote: > > >Can we filter on the word FREE and not hit FREEDOM, or filter SEX and > >not SEXTET. > > The question is *what* do you want to f

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Free or Freedom

2002-11-29 Thread R. Scott Perry
Can we filter on the word FREE and not hit FREEDOM, or filter SEX and not SEXTET. The question is *what* do you want to filter on? If you just want to filter on " FREE ", you won't catch "This is FREE!", for example. I know this has been talked about before but I can't recall if any changes

[Declude.JunkMail] Free or Freedom

2002-11-29 Thread Kami Razvan
Hi; Can we filter on the word FREE and not hit FREEDOM, or filter SEX and not SEXTET. I know of the 4 filter type: "CONTAINS", "STARTSWITH", "ENDSWITH", or "IS" I know this has been talked about before but I can't recall if any changes are made? In the subject this is something I tried to do a