Title: Message
Hi;
An interesting new
twist, at least from what I have noticed, is SPAM coming with no From
address. Here is a sample Header:
Reply-To:
"postmaster" "postmaster@"Message-ID:
Just as a note to this, we have a DNS (Simple DNS plus) on the same
machine as Imail/Declude and point to this DNS. Another DNS server sits
on the same 10Mb network whilst the primary is elsewhere. Cuts down on
internet look ups.
David
WiSS Limited
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Does MAILFROM filter detect invalid FROM addresses?
Yes, that's why you got the X- header.
IMail really should be changed to catch that, thought I must admit
that I use those addresses sometimes when testing--faster to type. :)
-Sandy
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude
Can I just check that the following is legal in myfilter.txt:
HEADERS 15 CONTAINS charset=GB2312
or should I use
HEADERS 15 CONTAINS GB2312
Either one will work.
-Scott
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This
Hello,
is there a good template somewhere I can send to an admin with a
misconfigured Mailserver? (no MX, no A, ...)
Alex
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send
I did an NSLOOKUP on our servers this morning and mail.aol.com and
mail.cs.com are coming up Non-existant Domains
mail.compuserve.com resolves.
So does that point to them or is it an issue with our DNS servers? Strange
That sounds like a problem with your DNS servers (even if they did have
I did an NSLOOKUP on our servers this morning and mail.aol.com and
mail.cs.com are coming up Non-existant Domains
mail.compuserve.com resolves.
Shows errors here:
http://www.dnsreport.com/tools/dnsreport.ch?domain=mail.aol.com
Try aol.com and cs.com:
I have had several complaints that 'periodically', the x headers that I add
sometimes end up in the beginning of the subject instead of in the header
where they obviously belong.
Client is using MS Outlook (which I also use without issue)
Any ideas???
- Tony Gray
Intouch Comm
from global.cfg
I have had several complaints that 'periodically', the x headers that I add
sometimes end up in the beginning of the subject instead of in the header
where they obviously belong.
Client is using MS Outlook (which I also use without issue)
Here's the problem:
XINHEADER X-Note - Total
you da man, thank you sir!!!
Must have had too much egg nog - tis the season as they say. :-)
- Tony
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 10:53 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
I have a feature request. With v1.65 of Declude JunkMail, the manual's list
of action precedences, my logs and my message headers have all the necessary
data for me to construct the post-facto reporting of what happened to a
given message. But it also means that I have to build into my
LOGFINALACTION ON
And with an accompanying variable, e.g. %FINALACTION% which could be used
thusly:
XOUTHEADER X-Spam-Final-Action: %FINALACTION%
I second that motion. :))
John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA
IT Manager, Network Engineer
RelianceSoft, Inc.
Fullerton, CA 92835
I have been seeing a couple of message a day in the held spam directory.
Bastards.
John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA
IT Manager, Network Engineer
RelianceSoft, Inc.
Fullerton, CA 92835
www.reliancesoft.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL
True, I would have an immediate use for logging the final action; I
suspected that others would have a user for a variable, e.g. when multiple
actions are performed, such as delivering a message and ALERT or BOUNCE,
marking up the original would be useful.
Andrew 8)
-Original Message-
XOUTHEADER X-Spam-Final-Action: %FINALACTION%
I'm not sure where this would be useful?
True, my bad. I read the line above that and didn't clearly read the rest.
LOGFINALACTION ON
That could be useful.
However, in our case since all actions are taken by weight, In the logs I
would just
LOGFINALACTION ON
That could be useful.
In the next release, the final action will appear (by number) if LOGLEVEL
HIGH is used.
-Scott
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail
Hey and I just got an email on a real cool piece of software that will let
me find out anything on anyone. We can use their own tools against them!!!
:-)
- Tony
I received the following message this AM. I think we should start a hitmen
for hire group to track these morons down. What do you
You know, too bad all that junk mail isn't worth 2 cents redeemable
somewhere like coupons are. I would be a millionaire by now.
John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA
IT Manager, Network Engineer
RelianceSoft, Inc.
Fullerton, CA 92835
www.reliancesoft.com
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by
One exception is the initial query - DNS implementations assume queries from
a random population, and don't search the active request list to see if a
request can be piggybacked on an outstanding request. So each IP4R test
from a new IP generates a separate request directly to the RBL.
Also,
19 matches
Mail list logo
