Is this thread something different than the Whitelistfile option
for the per domain junkmail configs (using 1.67beta)?
That's the same.
-Scott
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the
Has anyone else been seeing messages where the body is in the headers? I
have a n example below. Just started happening, and since declude
appends to the end, the body shows blank in Outlook.
Bad MSG
Received: from 202.88.150.30 [202.88.150.30] by argolink.net
(SMTPD32-6.06) id
Has anyone else been seeing messages where the body is in the headers?
Actually, someone else asked me the same thing just a few minutes ago,
regarding the same E-mail.
I have a n example below. Just started happening, and since declude
appends to the end, the body shows blank in Outlook.
Would it be possible to put the X-RBL warning and failed spam tests lines in
the header records of messages that are personally whitelisted via the
address book?
We've had a few requests from people who didn't get mail from x, add x
to their address book (to be whitelisted) and now would like to
Would it be possible to put the X-RBL warning and failed spam tests lines in
the header records of messages that are personally whitelisted via the
address book?
We've had a few requests from people who didn't get mail from x, add x
to their address book (to be whitelisted) and now would like to
Is there a way to setup the Heur10 test so that if the result of the level
10 test was 1.00 the test would have a weight of 5 but if the result was
.00 or less it would have a weight of 2?
I believe I'd have to setup two versions of the Heur10 test but I don't know
how to set it up for
Is there a way to setup the Heur10 test so that if the result of the level
10 test was 1.00 the test would have a weight of 5 but if the result was
.00 or less it would have a weight of 2?
No -- the HEURx tests were designed to provide 10 different levels; you
can't create your own
Has anyone else been seeing messages where the body is in the headers?
I do see this occasionally. For what it's worth, I mostly I see messages
without the header separator line in my HotMail account, not my corporate
account.
Andrew.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
Hello,
I am new to Declude Junkmail, and trying to get a handle on
what is happening in the message headers, and the global.cfg file. I have set all of the settings to log
only so I can track just what is being caught as spam first, before I enforce
any stricter rules. But when I look
I am new to Declude Junkmail, and trying to get a handle on what is
happening in the message headers, and the global.cfg file.I have set
all of the settings to log only so I can track just what is being caught
as spam first, before I enforce any stricter rules. But when I look at
the
Scott,
It appears that the %NRECIPS% variable is always showing double its true value. I ran
a bunch of tests and it looks like it is always double the true number of recipients.
Any ideas why?
I'm running Declude v1.67i13
Thanks,
Bill
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude
Is it possible to customize the notice that is placed in the header when
Declude Junkmail gets a warn instead of the standard x-rbl-warning:? This
way my outlook rules will be acting upon only what my server has found to be
suspicious messages, or can you suggest a better way for me to accomplish
Is it possible to customize the notice that is placed in the header when
Declude Junkmail gets a warn instead of the standard x-rbl-warning:?
Yes, you can do that. Instead of:
TESTNAMEWARN
you can use:
TESTNAMEWARNX-My-Header: %TESTNAME%: %WARNING%
Just
Origin Country - UNITED KINGDOM-SOUTH AFRICA-destination
Shouldn't this have been nabbed by Spam Routing?
Thanks,
Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA Internet Concepts, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.inetconcepts.net
PGP Key ID: 04C99A55 (972) 788-2364 Fax: (972)
It appears that the %NRECIPS% variable is always showing double its true
value. I ran a bunch of tests and it looks like it is always double the
true number of recipients. Any ideas why?
I'm running Declude v1.67i13
There is a new interim release at
Origin Country - UNITED KINGDOM-SOUTH AFRICA-destination
Shouldn't this have been nabbed by Spam Routing?
Not necessarily.
The SPAMROUTING test is based on the IPs of the mailservers, and doesn't
work based on the country that the E-mail is in (it uses wider geographic
locations, to allow for
Thanks, that fixed it.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: R. Scott Perry
Sent: Wed, 05 Mar 2003 13:48:42 -0500
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] %NRECIPS% - doubled
It appears that the %NRECIPS% variable is always showing double its true
value. I ran a bunch of tests and it looks like it
17 matches
Mail list logo
