Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Accounting for secondary MX

2003-06-02 Thread Sanford Whiteman
Could there be a feature where you could put in the IPs / DNS names of secondary MX servers and when mail comes from them it doesn't do RBL against that IP, but rather the IP that delivered the mail to the secondary. So the spam tests still work. That feature already exists--has for

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Accounting for secondary MX

2003-06-02 Thread Don Brown
What about HOP. Is that obsolete? Sunday, June 1, 2003, 5:29:15 PM, R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Could there be a feature where you could put in the IPs / DNS names of secondary MX servers and when mail comes from them it doesn't do RBL against that IP, but rather the IP that

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Accounting for secondary MX

2003-06-02 Thread Joshua Levitsky
Thank you sooo much. I had a total failure of my RAID array on my mail server. I was up all night last night fixing it and when I replaced the drives, re-installed windows, restored from backup, and then got back online I found that I didn't know how to get Declude to do that and since I had

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Accounting for secondary MX

2003-06-02 Thread Omar K.
Sorry to that, but im curious, what brand of HD should we be avoiding? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joshua Levitsky Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 3:16 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Accounting for secondary MX

[Declude.JunkMail] WHITELIST HELO- revisited

2003-06-02 Thread Kami Razvan
Title: Message Scott: You mentioned earlier that you do not think that WHITELIST HELO be something that should be used too often. Could you please elaborate on this. Why? Can HELO be faked easily? We deal with a lot with universities and government agencies as well as various clients