Scott, quick question.
I see postings that v1.69 beta is the newest version of Junkmail...
But in the online manual it says v1.65 or v1.70 beta are available.
I currently have v1.67. Without going to beta's, shouldn't the version I go to be
v1.68?
Or is v1.69 out (not beta)???
Thanks
Scott, quick question.
I see postings that v1.69 beta is the newest version of Junkmail...
But in the online manual it says v1.65 or v1.70 beta are available.
The versions listed in the manual are always up-to-date. So the latest
released version is 1.65, the latest beta is 1.70.
Messages on
Title: Message
Hi;
I just received an
email from Linksys and I thought it could be of interest to the group.
Look at the header:
X-IMAIL-SPAM-VALHELO:
(43516214)X-IMAIL-SPAM-VALREVDNS: (43516214)
X-RBL-Warning:
REVDNS: This E-mail was sent from a MUA/MTA 202.164.174.44 with no reverse DNS
Title: Message
What
does your subject line have to do with the body of the
message
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Kami
RazvanSent: Monday, June 30, 2003 8:49 AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] If CISCO
Title: Message
This
email was sent through a server in the Philippines
Country: PHILIPPINES (high)ARIN says
that this IP belongs to APNIC; I'm looking it up there.
Using cached answer (or, you can get
fresh results).% [whois.apnic.net node-1]% How to use this
server
Title: Message
Cisco bought Linksys.
John
Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices
For You
626-737-6003
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.eservicesforyou.com
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Bilbee
Sent: Monday,
No, I do not think so with this guy. His web page would be simply for adding
a domain to NOT send to at all. No personal email addresses to be entered.
I would not enter our domain as we are an ISP (and this all started with one
of our users not getting his opt-in stuff). But an business or
Scott
How about a new Manual page. The last released version was in early
December and there have been a ton of new things added. It is getting
harder and harder to search through the archives to find clarification
on a feature.
Many thanks.
David
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by
How about a new Manual page. The last released version was in early
December and there have been a ton of new things added. It is getting
harder and harder to search through the archives to find clarification
on a feature.
That's exactly why we haven't updated it to reflect the new features --
How about a new Manual page. The last released version was in early
December and there have been a ton of new things added. It is getting
harder and harder to search through the archives to find clarification
on a feature.
That is because there is no new release version yet.
As Scott has
Please forgive my ignorance here ~
I have noticed that when I send e-mail from outlook 2000 that the nat'ed IP
of my T1 provider shows up and it does not have a reverse DNS.
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 16:55:52 -0400
Message-ID:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=iso-8859-1
100124,1011 is a valid CompuServe ID account format and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] the valid compuserve email address format - not
at all toomanynumbersbeforethe@'.
In Europe, you will often see:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Also a perfectly valid email address for the largest European provider.
Even in the U.S.,
I asked my ISP to provide reverse DNS entries for my block of IP's and they
replied:
If you want us to create the DNS records, you need to tell us
which IP points to which fully-qualified hostnames. These hostnames
need to match actual forward DNS record too.
Are they right do I need FQDNs for
I understand but there are far too many changes between releases and
many interim releases between betas. Beta is usually a set of features
and fixes and then a release. With Declude there are new features with
every beta. Freeze something and release it.
Thanks
David Stavert
-Original
These are very old compuserve-style ID's. The two numbers represent the
person's User ID to log into Compuserve (actually, there is a comma in their
ID, but for internet access it becomes a period). I still use mine as a
backup (and get spam there, under both the number and name/alias assigned,
With Declude there are new features with
every beta. Freeze something and release it.
That's what we are working on. :)
We have one issue that we are working on, and then should have a released
version.
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The
I just received a junk mail (coffee offer) with the following header
snippet:
X-Declude-Sender:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [69.24.239.48]
X-Declude: Failed FIVETEN-SRC, IPNOTINMX, NOLEGITCONTENT [2]
X-Note: This E-mail was sent from out028.tpcper.com ([69.24.239.48]).
X-Countries: [IANA
Would it make sense to start building beta documentation at the same time
you release beta code, and create a beta testers web site with the beta
documentation. That way people can provide feed-back on the documentation
as well as the code prior to release. Then, once the beta code is ready to
Scott
I'm going to appologize again.
FWIW, the reason we use this unusual beta cycle (where each
beta normally both adds new features and fixes bugs, rather than
having an
initial beta with tons of new features and subsequent betas just
fixing
bugs) is because we're able to get more
We use a software versioning and release methodology like Scott has outlined
here...and while it does take a while to get new features to customers this
way, it is necessary to ensure the reliability of our products.
However, for Declude, the product is geared towards a rapidly changing
landscape
20 matches
Mail list logo
