My best guess as to what happened was that the E-mail was incorrectly being
sent with a CR or LF character instead of the proper CRLF sequence, as both
IMail and Declude were adding the headers to the body of the E-mail
(indicating that both saw the end of the headers after the E-mail body).
Are you running two IMail/Declude servers? It looks like the E-mail went
to your MX3.NetWood.net (Postfix), which sent to it to centurymedia.com
(IMail) which sent it to MX4.NetWood.net (Postfix) which sent it to
netwood.net (IMail).
This is correct. For some reason the email should not have
Scott,
With the countries test, can it fail more that one country? If so, can you
change it so that it lists every line it failed? For example, I have the
following:
COUNTRIES 1 CONTAINS*A
COUNTRIES 1 CONTAINS*B
COUNTRIES 1 CONTAINS*E
What RBL's currently work?
Is the global.cfg on the declude website up to date with the working ones?
Thanks
Timothy C. Bohen
CMSInter.Net LLC / Crystal MicroSystems LLC
===
web : www.cmsinter.net
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
phone: 989.235.5100 x222
fax
What RBL's currently work?
Only one -- see http://www.mail-abuse.org .
If you are talking about DNS-based spam databases, there are lots -- see
http://www.declude.com/junkmail/support/ip4r.htm .
Is the global.cfg on the declude website up to date with the working ones?
We constantly update the
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My best guess as to what happened was that the E-mail was incorrectly
being
sent with a CR or LF character instead of the proper CRLF sequence, as
both
IMail and Declude were adding the headers to the body of the E-mail
I have also noticed today that it appears Declude JunkMail is no
longer calculating weights correctly.
If you upgrade to the latest interim release at
http://www.declude.com/release/176i/declude.exe , it takes care of
this
issue.
Wasn't actually expecting a response until tomorrow
Okay, I'll buy that--although I not sure how you determined it, since the
message displays properly in Outlook Express.
That's probably because the CR or LF will get translated to a CRLF when
IMail and Declude process the E-mail.
Okay, if that's the case, shouldn't Declude also add it's
If you don't mind me asking, what interim release or full
release did the above weighting issue affect?
The weighting issue was introduced in one of the v1.76 interim releases
(1.76i5, I believe), so it affected very few people.
-Scott
Yeah I meant the DNS based ones sorry, so in order to get an updated list of
them I just need global.cfg right? not the $defualt.Junkmail$ file??
Timothy C. Bohen
CMSInter.Net LLC / Crystal MicroSystems LLC
===
web : www.cmsinter.net
email: [EMAIL
Yeah I meant the DNS based ones sorry, so in order to get an updated list of
them I just need global.cfg right? not the $defualt.Junkmail$ file??
The updated global.cfg file defines the tests, which will run them and use
them towards the weighting system. If you also want to take an action
Does anyone have a current file of domains for the spamdomains
test that they would like to share?
Thanks
Jeffrey Di Gregorio
Systems Administrator
Pacific School of Religion
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
510-849-8283
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R.
Scott Perry
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 2:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] RBL's
The updated global.cfg file defines the tests, which will run
them and use
You still have the monkeys.com entries in your default global.cfg. Didn't
they go dark a few weeks ago?
Thanks for pointing this out -- those tests did indeed go away, and they
were still in the default config files. The default config files have been
updated to reflect this.
Does anyone have some good documents on the proper usage of reverse DNS PTR
records?
There really aren't, as far as I know.
I am trying to reconcile the class C which is allocated to us but
I don't know which hostname I am supposed to use in the PTR record.
The best advice that I have seen is to
15 matches
Mail list logo
