RE: [0] RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Experience with Statistical Filtering [IMail 8.02]

2003-11-10 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Title: Message Correct. John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Danny Klopfer Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2003 5:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [0] RE:

[Declude.JunkMail] WhitelistFile

2003-11-10 Thread Kris McElroy
Can I have Whitelist File in the Global.cfg ? whitelistfile d:\Imail\Declude\mywhitelist.txt Thanks, Kris McElroy [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chief Technology Officer Duracom, INC. www.duracom.net I am always doing that which I can not do, in order that I may learn how to do it. --- [This

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] WhitelistFile

2003-11-10 Thread R. Scott Perry
Can I have Whitelist File in the Global.cfg ? No. It only applies to config files for incoming E-mail. -Scott --- Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers. Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in

[Declude.JunkMail] More ATTACH and MAILBOX questions

2003-11-10 Thread Burzin Sumariwalla
Hello, I'm testing out the ATTACH and MAILBOX options. In web messaging many of the Declude tagged MAILBOX and ATTACH messages do not display the Declude spam hider info. or appear as attachments. Is this are there workarounds for web messaging? I'm using Declude 1.75 and Imail 8.03.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] More ATTACH and MAILBOX questions

2003-11-10 Thread R. Scott Perry
I'm testing out the ATTACH and MAILBOX options. In web messaging many of the Declude tagged MAILBOX and ATTACH messages do not display the Declude spam hider info. or appear as attachments. Is this are there workarounds for web messaging? I believe that IMail's web messaging doesn't support

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] More ATTACH and MAILBOX questions

2003-11-10 Thread Burzin Sumariwalla
Is support for emails within emails required to preface the original email with... You have spam! Subject:%SUBJECT% From: %MAILFROM% Tests Failed: %TESTSFAILED% To view the E-mail, just click the attachment. Burzin At 02:22 PM 11/10/2003, you wrote: I'm testing out the

[Declude.JunkMail] Filter Entry Not Being Triggered

2003-11-10 Thread Darrell LaRock
BODY5 CONTAINS href=#104;#116;#116;#112; Should there by any reason why the above filter entry wouldn't be triggered on an email that contains that string in the html source? What am I doing wrong? Darrell --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] More ATTACH and MAILBOX questions

2003-11-10 Thread Burzin Sumariwalla
I'm sorry, I was referring specifically to web messaging. Burzin At 03:04 PM 11/10/2003, you wrote: Is support for emails within emails required to preface the original email with... You have spam! Subject:%SUBJECT% From: %MAILFROM% Tests Failed: %TESTSFAILED% To view the

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter Entry Not Being Triggered

2003-11-10 Thread Matthew Bramble
Are you sure it didn't contain a line break in the source? Try out my OBFUSCATION filter. I've attached it since I haven't had time to comment it up appropriately and put it on my site. Matt Darrell LaRock wrote: BODY 5 CONTAINS href=#104;#116;#116;#112; Should there by any reason why the

[Declude.JunkMail] Compatibility with .NET

2003-11-10 Thread Keith Purtell
I spoke with one of our programmers regarding a simple idea I had to allow us to simplify white list administration via the Web. All we have to do is upload new entries in a text file and have them automatically added to my existing white list text file. But he wants to install a Microsoft .NET

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Compatibility with .NET

2003-11-10 Thread Kevin Bilbee
If you are going to try to get ASP.net to work it will not on NT. the .net frame work will function but the IIS portion will not. If you want to use ASP.net the you need to update to Windows 2000 Kevin Bilbee Network Administrator Standard Abrasives, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Declude.JunkMail] some spam slipping through...

2003-11-10 Thread Scot Desort
We've had quite a bit of spam getting through lately, all with a similarly formatted subject line: X-F: xxx Mon Nov 10 15:23:57 2003 Received: from h51n1fls34o281.telia.com [213.66.91.51] by xxx (SMTPD32-6.06) id A3D216140152; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 15:23:46 -0500 Received: from 206.147.156.5 by

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] some spam slipping through...

2003-11-10 Thread Matthew Bramble
Scot Desort wrote: Notice the %RND_UC_CHAR[2-8] in the subject. Looks like broken spam software that is supposed to insert RaNDom characters into the subject. We've seen this coming from a variety of sources. I guess we can just filter for that string in the SUBJECT? It's not failing enough tests

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] some spam slipping through...

2003-11-10 Thread Fritz Squib
Scot, Yep, seen quite a few %RND_UC_CHAR, also have seen rndline in the subject from different broken spamware. I have added the following to my subject filter to push them over the edge. SUBJECT 20 CONTAINS%RND_ SUBJECT 20 CONTAINSrndline Fritz Frederick P. Squib,

[Declude.JunkMail] How can I whitelist my users? Reverse DNS?

2003-11-10 Thread Marc Catuogno
I am running IMAIL 7.15 and Declude 1.75. I knew I had a big no-no in my Global file; whitelist from prudentialrand.com. A spammer has now been exploiting it. How can I get my users whitelisted so they can communicate with each other without worrying about being filtered without letting the

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] some spam slipping through...

2003-11-10 Thread Fritz Squib
Matt, Great job on the filters...Thanks. Here is one in it's entirety from one of my spamtraps, only the names have been changed to protect my 'honeypot'. Fritz Frederick P. Squib, Jr. Network Operations/Mail Administrator Citizens Telephone Company of Kecksburg http://www.wpa.net () ascii

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] How can I whitelist my users? Reverse DNS?

2003-11-10 Thread Matthew Bramble
Whitelisting by IP is the safest since it is the hardest to spoof. Whitelisting by reverse DNS would do no better than by IP because you have off-network users connecting directly to your mail server (seen with that X-Declude-Sender entry), so choose IP over reverse DNS. The best solution

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] some spam slipping through...

2003-11-10 Thread Frederick Samarelli
FYI:We have Sniffer and it has been catching these for us. - Original Message - From: Fritz Squib [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 10:26 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] some spam slipping through... Matt, Great job on the filters...Thanks.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] some spam slipping through...

2003-11-10 Thread Scot Desort
Matt: The FOREIGN/TLD filter set that I shared yesterday for instance would have added at least 3 points to this message and possibly two more depending on the X-Declude-Sender which you cut out. I saw your post and I have not yet added that filter. I will be reviewing it shortly and plan on

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] some spam slipping through...

2003-11-10 Thread Matthew Bramble
Fritz, Well, you did pretty well on tagging that one I would say :) You caught it with a SPAMDOMAINS entry for instance, and I can't verify if Message Sniffer would catch this. The only additional scoring that my server would have levied outside of Message Sniffer would have been with my

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] some spam slipping through...

2003-11-10 Thread Matthew Bramble
Scot, The dictionary randomization is obviously a better system and won't get tagged by many of my tests. The DYNAMIC filter would have scored this one though, as well as some others. It would be a good idea to look at adding canada.com to SPAMDOMAINS if you can find the standard reverse DNS

[Declude.JunkMail] Imail and Declude process order ... etc

2003-11-10 Thread Michael L. Hardrick
Greetings All, What is the Declude Virus/Junkmail Imail process order for emails sent to the server and are mailbox forwards treated different then standard mailboxes?? Thanks, Mike --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail and Declude process order ... etc

2003-11-10 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Imail SMTP Kill.lst and Control Access lists. Declude Virus Declude Hijack Declude JunkMail Imail Rules For Imail 8.x, the following is true: Imail SMTP Kill.lst and Control Access lists. Imail AntiSpam checks (if used) Declude Virus Declude Hijack Declude JunkMail Imail AntiSpam statistical