Hi,
Can I make a test (like SPAMCOP) be included in the weighting system, but
also be a HOLD action by itself?
So, if it fails SPAMCOP it will be held, but if the total wieght exceeds the
DELETE threshold, it will be deleted.
Thanks, Andy
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude
Hi Andy:
We do this by using weightrange.
We simply add a weight that is way out of the range of other tests, e.g.
1000
Then we bracket the tests and apply different actions on different ranges.
When you use this type of weighing.. For example every test is 1 or 2 or
20.. The collection of
I don't know whether this is news to anyone here, but I found this during my
research for a replacement for EasyNet and thought I'd pass it along because
it is still listed as active in the Declude DNS Database list.
http://www.fabel.dk/relay/test/
Actually, it appears that the DEVNULL test died,
Scott, would it make sense to report in the X-RBL-Warning filter headers
the weights as defined by MAXWEIGHT in the filter file whenever the total
filter score is more than what is defined by the MAXWEIGHT setting? That
way when you visually add up all of the X-Header weights, the score will
I understand - I think - about IPBYPASS but HOPHIGH is another story..
HOPHIGH, if used, will cause Declude JunkMail to scan extra hops.
For example, if I was to set up our mailserver to send this E-mail through
our ISP's mailserver, Declude JunkMail would normally just scan the IP of
our
Any thoughts on adding some logic to Declude.. Simple logic..
Like: Actions that set the result immediately in the filter. (e.g.
ENDALLTests or Delete)
This is something that we will be looking into.
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced
Can I make a test (like SPAMCOP) be included in the weighting system, but
also be a HOLD action by itself?
So, if it fails SPAMCOP it will be held, but if the total wieght exceeds the
DELETE threshold, it will be deleted.
Yes. If you use the default configuration, you can just use SPAMCOP
Kami,
That's way too complicated for my simple mind. I have no idea what is
happening in the example. Simple is way better and fits my less than genius
IQ.
If that's the only way, I'll just make SPAMCOP have a weight of 10, then it
will HOLD.
I was hoping I could do it by putting a HOLD
Of course you have seen Scott's response. That is really what you need.
Our system does a little more gating..
Just to give you an example..
We use IMAGEFX's blacklist. But we do not want that list to be used for
regular weight since we always block the emails blacklisted by that list and
The following is from the log, in debug. The entries in global and
junkmail look o.k. I'll send them, if you want them.
11/30/2003 10:18:22 Q182808dd00fa1619 Using [incoming] CFG file
D:\IMail\Declude\xxxCHANGEDxxx.com\$default$.junkmail.
11/30/2003 10:18:22 Q182808dd00fa1619 Warning:
11/30/2003 10:18:22 Q182808dd00fa1619 Warning: misconfiguration in
following line in configuration file (BOUNCE is not an ACTION).
The latest interim release requires the name of the action to be changed to
BOUNCEONLYIFYOUMUST, because it seems that a very large number of our
customers are
Matt,
As soon as I can afford it I'm buying Message Sniffer. Running it as a
trial, it proved itself to be an obvious winner.
Have you tried SPAMCHK? It takes some configging but for me at least it does a great
job - and its free. http://www.spamchk.com
-Nick Hayer
--Matt Robertson--
MSB
Thanks!
-Nick
-- Original Message --
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 08:26:59 -0500
I understand - I think - about IPBYPASS but HOPHIGH is another story..
HOPHIGH, if used, will cause Declude
Nick wrote:
Have you tried SPAMCHK? It takes some configging but for me at least it
does a
great job - and its free. http://www.spamchk.com
Never heard of it, but you can bet I'm going to look it over very closely.
Thanks for the tip!
Cool site banner.
--Matt--
---
[This E-mail was scanned
Does anyone know why I am getting this in the Declude log file.
11/30/2003 23:27:44 Warning: misconfiguration in following line in
configuration file (catchallmails is not an ACTION). May be a duplicate test
definition?
11/30/2003 23:27:44 catchallmails x x 0 0
Fred
---
[This E-mail was
Belay my last.
I had a duplicate entry.
Thanks.
Fred
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe
Does anyone know why I am getting this in the Declude log file.
'catchallmails' is a test type; it needs a test name as well to
function.
-Sandy
Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist
Broadleaf Systems, a division of
Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc.
17 matches
Mail list logo
