RE: [Declude.JunkMail] MAILBOX?

2004-08-05 Thread Kami Razvan
Hi Scott: I have tested it several times- a weight of 35 is supposed to go the spam mailbox but it does not go. The COPY action works- the mailbox action is not working. Regards, Kami -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] MAILBOX?

2004-08-05 Thread R. Scott Perry
Has there been changes in 1.79i16 regarding mailbox? None that I am aware of. I have the following: WEIGHT20s SUBJECT [%WEIGHT%~] WEIGHT20c COPYTO mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] WEIGHT20m MAILBOX spam This used to work but now recently I am seeing mail is not diverted to the spam

[Declude.JunkMail] MAILBOX?

2004-08-05 Thread Kami Razvan
Hi .. Has there been changes in 1.79i16 regarding mailbox? I have the following: WEIGHT20sSUBJECT [%WEIGHT%~]WEIGHT20cCOPYTO [EMAIL PROTECTED]WEIGHT20mMAILBOX spam This used to work but now recently I am seeing mail is not diverted to the spam mailbox. I am debugging trying to figure

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] MAILBOX?

2004-08-05 Thread R. Scott Perry
I have tested it several times- a weight of 35 is supposed to go the spam mailbox but it does not go. The COPY action works- the mailbox action is not working. Have you double-checked everything to make sure that it is set up properly (when you have multiple actions per test, you need to be

[Declude.JunkMail] Web-Access.com

2004-08-05 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Any one familiar with this, or know what kind of domain/site/service it is? John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Web-Access.com

2004-08-05 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Finally found it. It is a client login site for a financial institution, and very legit. I was worried because the domain name would give you thoughts of web mail or anaynomizers or portals and such. John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You -Original Message-

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] MAILBOX?

2004-08-05 Thread Kami Razvan
Scott: This is what I have in Global: WEIGHT20s weight x x 20 0 WEIGHT20c weight x x 20 0 WEIGHT20m weight x x 20 0 then in default$.junkmail WEIGHT20s SUBJECT

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] MAILBOX?

2004-08-05 Thread R. Scott Perry
This is what I have in Global: WEIGHT20s weight x x 20 0 WEIGHT20c weight x x 20 0 WEIGHT20m weight x x 20 0 then in default$.junkmail WEIGHT20s SUBJECT

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] MAILBOX?

2004-08-05 Thread Kami Razvan
Hi; The 20 test should cover 20+ - should it not? So a 35 should go to the mailbox. There is no 35 test. I will send you the global default off list if you want. Kami -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Thursday,

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] MAILBOX?

2004-08-05 Thread R. Scott Perry
The 20 test should cover 20+ - should it not? Yes. So a 35 should go to the mailbox. There is no 35 test. OK, I was not aware of that. I thought you had a test set up to block E-mail with a weight of 35 or higher. I will send you the global default off list if you want. The debug mode would

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] New ALL_LIST.DAT File?

2004-08-05 Thread Donna Walsh
what is to be done with this all_list.dat? Donna Walsh Has the file been updated? It has just been updated, and is at http://www.declude.com/version/release/all_list.dat . -Scott --- Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] New ALL_LIST.DAT File?

2004-08-05 Thread R. Scott Perry
what is to be done with this all_list.dat? Does anybody read the archives? :) Not only is the response in the archives, but so many people asked, I responded after the post you are responding to. :) So if you check your copies of the posts from this list, you'll find it.

[Declude.JunkMail] HELOBOGUS and MAIL GATEWAYS

2004-08-05 Thread Mike Gable
Hello, We are usinga 3rd party (offsite) gateway service for our inbound mail and some of the host servers that we receive mail from fail the HELOBOGUS test (no MX or A record). Is ther a way to safely skip the HELOBOGUS test on these known hosts? Thanks. -Mike