Hi Mark,
> Andrew,
> We have 3 equal MX records and 3 A records for "load balancing" and
> redundancy.
> We also have a 4th MX which is physically off-site that's a lower
preference
> level.
>
> I put load-balancing in quotes because we still see our number 1 server
take
> the brunt of the load.
scott
thanks for the offer
i'm more a foxpro guy
but i suppose the access code will be easy to translate
would appreciate if you email the code
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Fisher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 2:32 AM
Subject: RE: [Declud
thanks for the tutorial
this is why this list is great
everyone willing to share
bill, matt, kami, john, ... (to name a few)
can't thank you guys enough
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Landry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 2:37 AM
Subject: Re
imail logs
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Landry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 2:37 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] LOG Levels
- Original Message -
From: "Serge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bill
some time ago you mentioned putting tog
Could you post that please?
Thanks!
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Fisher
> Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 9:32 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] LOG Levels
>
> If you are interested, I have Micro
Andrew,
We have 3 equal MX records and 3 A records for "load balancing" and
redundancy.
We also have a 4th MX which is physically off-site that's a lower preference
level.
I put load-balancing in quotes because we still see our number 1 server take
the brunt of the load.
Mark
> -Original Mes
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Fisher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I constantly use this batch file to find in the Declude logs.
> I change the V_logday to the day of the log to search
> and the V_find to the term to find. (It's usual a specific mail id
(Q7172144401ba4a6b or such) and I'll g
If you are interested, I have Microsoft Access 2002 VBA code that imports the logs
into Microsoft Access Databases. Link in a SQL Database instead and you can import to
SQL I presume.
This code has been working pretty well for months for me.
I have individual code for the Declude Virus, Declude
I constantly use this batch file to find in the Declude logs.
I change the V_logday to the day of the log to search
and the V_find to the term to find. (It's usual a specific mail id (Q7172144401ba4a6b
or such) and I'll get all log pieces for that mail item.
set v_path=c:\declude\logs
set v_logpa
- Original Message -
From: "Colbeck, Andrew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On various domains I administer, a single point of failure mailhost has
been
> good enough, but I'm shortly going to add a second host on a second
network
> for redundancy.
>
> Now, I understand *how* to do that, but what
Bill
some time ago you mentioned putting together a short "grep" tutorial for
this list
was this ever posted ? if yes, can you email or repost ?
what would be a short grep batch file where we can enter an address
[EMAIL PROTECTED] as parameter and get all the lines off all the sessions with
mail
On Thursday, November 4, 2004, 7:01:22 PM, Andrew wrote:
CA> An Off Topic thread ...
CA> For example I could keep my single MX record and have round robin on the A
CA> records. Or I could make a separate MX record and A record for each
CA> mailhost, or do a classic MX = 10 and MX = 20 with a s
An Off Topic thread ...
On various domains I administer, a single point of failure mailhost has been
good enough, but I'm shortly going to add a second host on a second network
for redundancy.
Now, I understand *how* to do that, but what I would like to hear from those
who've been there before me
Mark,
I would grab V-Fileviewer, it opens large files in chunks, much
faster. Opens 500MB files in seconds.
http://www.fileviewer.com
Keith
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark E. Smith
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 3:56 PM
- Original Message -
From: "DLAnalyzer Support" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Those are both great tools. My only complaint with BareTail is I get a
lot
> of flicker under TS. However, their older wintail has no flicker...
Try the grep and tail tools included with the GNU Win32 UNIX utilities
- Original Message -
From: "Mark E. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The problem right now is loading a 350mb (let alone 1.6GB) file with
> notepad. :)
Why would you want to open any log in notepad - use grep instead, it is
lightning fast at parsing large log files.
Bill
---
[This E-mail w
Those are both great tools. My only complaint with BareTail is I get a lot
of flicker under TS. However, their older wintail has no flicker...
Darrell
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude An
Try BareTail and BareGrep instead, from http://www.baremetalsoft.com/
Great for monitoring logs in real-time as well.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: "Mark E. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 3:55 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail]
We have 4 inbound equal MX servers each with 250-350 per day so we're about
the same in net-net load.
I started writing a log parsing program that will consolidate the logs and
insert them into a central SQL database.
That way I'll be able to do a query on a message and debug much easier.
The prob
My Declude logs at HIGH range between 1.2 and 1.6 GIGABYTES. The log for
11/3 is 1,701,795 KB.
- Original Message -
From: "Mark E. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 9:03 AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] LOG Levels
> I've always used LOG
Yep...the old upgrade method works fine. Not sure where they got to on the
packaged install, but it seems like it added config files for Hijack which
raised a lot of questions.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Geiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, No
Hello, All,
I am currently running Declude 1.79. On the virus mailing list, because of
a bug with regular zips being blocked as encrypted zips, Scott recommended
that I upgrade to 1.81. I have yet to upgrade Declude using the new upgrade
methodology. When I go to our account page it is offering
Mark,
You will lose some functionality on log level MID. I am not exactly sure
which reports you are currently running, but if you check out
http://www.invariantsystems.com/dlanalyzer/support.htm it will let you know
which log levels are required for each specific report.
If you need any he
I've always used LOGLEVEL HIGH on my systems but I'm reconsidering that
these days since our logs are running 250mb - 350mb.
I use a number of log reports (DLAnalyizer, etc)
If I switch to LOGLEVEL MID will I lose anything in my log reporting utils?
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by D
On 3 Nov 2004 at 19:37, Sanford Whiteman wrote:
> > Question - with your new 'e' switch - can the weight returned be
> > capped eg a max return value?
>
> Nope, not as currently implemented.
>
> Come to think of it, though, I think I will add this in just for you.
> :) What the heck? I'll re
25 matches
Mail list logo
