Any word on whether Declude has decided to support Smartermail? I'm
running Imail 7.13 and 8.10. No rush to switch except for reliability.
I'm tired of Imail NIC problems and the POP service always locking up.
So far I've been extremely happy with Smartertools products.
--
Best regards,
David
Thanks. I will try this. Also thank you for not just flatly referring me
to the manual, where I found this documented after you told me the name of
the test.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Davidson
Sent: Sunday, November 07, 2004
What about SQL support in another product? I'd look at switching but the db
storage is key to me. I rebuilt a machine after a crash and had imail back
running with 100+ domains and 2000 users quickly with all the account info
coming from their.
E
-- Original Message
Hello Eric,
Monday, November 8, 2004, 9:30:42 AM, you wrote:
EK What about SQL support in another product? I'd look at
EK switching but the db storage is key to me. I rebuilt a machine
EK after a crash and had imail back running with 100+ domains and
EK 2000 users quickly with all the account
To add to Andrew's comments:
If you have the Pro version: some of Matt's test at Mailpure especially the
foreign tests.
I've had good results with the UCE Protect ip4r. It's only been about a
momth, but it looks to be 99.9% good here
UCEPROTECT-ALL ip4r dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net * 50 0
If
Thanks for the responses.
Since my e-mail account is one of the two being
joe-jobbed, I've got lots of samples to look at...
I'll document how I attacked the problem for the
mailing archive:
The spammer sends out thee subject base64 encoded
(Subject: =?iso-8859-1?B?).
It also will forge
I'm presently noting mail from sprint.com coming from the following
outsourced sites
sprint.com
lightwave.com
bigfish.com
I presently have my spamdomains set to
sprint lightwave.com
But I thought spamdomains could not handle multiple entries.
How do I deal with this, or just get rid of
Dave,
SPAMDOMAINS can handle two different domains (so long as the Mail From
domain is one of them), but it can't handle two of them. You can
however construct a special filter just for Sprint.
MAILFROM END NOTENDSWITH sprint.com
REVDNS END NOTCONTAINS .
REVDNS END ENDSWITH
Scott Fisher wrote:
The Earthlink and Spamarrest filters
are the most annoying. I almost want to reply to them so they get the
original spam
I sometimes do that :)
Matt
--
=
MailPure custom filters for Declude JunkMail Pro.
Mailing Lists wrote:
We're moving our installs to SM as well, hoping to see Declude support
for it ):
Ditto! One more vote for SM.
Jim
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe,
We're moving our installs to SM as well, hoping to see Declude support for
it ):
PV
- Original Message -
From: David Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2004 9:26 AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude/Smartermail
Any word on whether Declude has
We're moving our installs to SM as well, hoping to see Declude support
for it ):
J Ditto! One more vote for SM.
Looks like we're going that route as well with our 2 (soon to be 3)
installations.
Really hope to be able to take Declude with us. If not, will probably migrate
to MXGuard.
We are probably leaning this way too but still unsure because of sign-up
applications we run require we store email account user info into SQL.
-Don
- Original Message -
From: David Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2004 11:38 AM
Subject: Re[2]:
DS We are probably leaning this way too but still unsure because of sign-up
DS applications we run require we store email account user info into SQL.
Yep, email address and associated date link to other customer data for
us too. The way to handle it is through syncing dbase data with data in
the
A single .gif with the standard phish.
Greg
1u364325j3s543897032362548.gif
Description: Binary data
You could block with a body filter on the URL.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: System Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2004 2:46 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] anyone know how to stop this?
A single .gif with the standard phish.
Greg
If you have the horsepower to spare...
Use ClamAv and Turn PreScan off with Declude Virus Pro.
131 Phish detections this month through yesterday (33271 total e-mails).
You are going to be scanning a lot lot more stuff. But not too many phish
are going to get through.
ClamAv seems to be going
I've been trapping them with the various suntrust strings in the subject
line.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2004 3:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] anyone know how to
And if you *really* have horsepower to spare (and some of your own time),
implement Sandy's spamc to hook into a SpamAssassin daemon and run SURBL.
Me, I'm waiting for SURBL support in Declude, as the Outblaze and Phishing
URI tests in the multi.surbl.org cover a lot of fresh phishing domains.
I think fraud.rhs.mailpolice.com would also work with the SURBL.
- Original Message -
From: Colbeck, Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2004 2:42 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] anyone know how to stop this?
And if you *really* have horsepower
we will move to smartermail as soon as declude release a version for it
- Original Message -
From: David Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2004 7:33 PM
Subject: Re[4]: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude/Smartermail
DS We are probably leaning this
It does, but it can also be used with Declude as an RHSBL now:
MAILPOLICE-FRAUDfraud.rhs.mailpolice.com 127.0.0.230
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Scott Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2004 12:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail]
They are so far ahead of Imail by using. . . XML instead of. . .
registry it's not funny.
Hrm. An XML file vs. a memory-mapped, intelligently cached, indexed
b-tree.
Or an XML file vs. a central RDBMS already holding subscriber data and
used by multiple third-party applications.
Or an
Hello Sanford,
Monday, November 8, 2004, 4:36:07 PM, you wrote:
They are so far ahead of Imail by using. . . XML instead of. . .
registry it's not funny.
SW Hrm. An XML file vs. a memory-mapped, intelligently cached, indexed
SW b-tree.
The biggest problem with the registry is that it
Here is a link to MailMax http://www.smartmax.com/mailmax.aspx (They also
offer a competitive Upgrade) pricing offer for those moving off of a
competitor's system.
- Wolf
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don Schreiner
Sent: Monday,
Has anyone load tested Smartermail? It looks pretty good, but being rather
new on the market and only showing smaller clients as their customers I'm
wondering how many domains and users they can really scale to. This is the
one major concern I have with them (and also the primary reason I've
Holding off on SmarterMail here too and again need SQL DB with email account
info for our integrated member applications. Do you have a link to MailMax?
I am just as upset as others about IMail recent policies and been using
since version 4.0. Today I saw a post you can renew unlimted version
The biggest problem with the registry is that it is basically an
opaque binary file structure that if (when) it gets corrupted is
almost irretrievable.
It's irretrievable if people don't have a backup. If people don't run
backups, they shouldn't run mailservers.
The claim that
28 matches
Mail list logo
