Can we talk sometime early today about this? I am not sure you and I are on
the same page unless I am miss reading all of these threads. I am 99% sure
it is blowing up in HijackGetIp() and 95% sure is it this line...
c = *env.databodystart;
To work this out, I really need to speak with you
DNS? I saw this when the DNS server my Imail was querying started
having problems. Try using a different dns server.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Serge
Sent: Saturday, February 12, 2005 7:48 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
I'm sure some of you have seen this by now, but for those that haven't
=there's a new eBay phishing site at 64.40.147.2 that you may want to
=block.Darin.
I received 2 online pharmacy spams to my inbox (log snips and headers
attached). One came in Saturday night at ~9:11, the other ~9:36. They
were queued, then on Sunday at 3:32 AM, they were both delivered. They
were never scanned by Declude.
I'm trying to figure out what happened. First of
No changes have been made to Imail. There is a scheduled task that runs
at 3:00 AM that reboots the Imail server. I suspect that the first
queue run after reboot was when they were delivered.
Others will chime in, but this is a known issue that after a reboot that the
QueueManager will grab
We are having pbs with Imail 8.15+KWM
Local emails fine, but when an email has a remote address, it just
vanishes.
Had the same issue few weeks back, had to reinstall imail and KWM, fixed
the pb.
Tiday, pb is back, and do not wan yo keep installing evrything.
Anyone have an idea about how to fix
Has anyone seen a problem with Yahoo Email?
It looks like email from our network is not getting to Yahoo accounts.
Our IP's fail SPAMBAG and SPEWS (this is because they list our IP provider).
They are clean on all other tests.
Anyone know how to contact Yahoo or have seen this problem?
Fred
No.. that won't work.
I am yet to see a body that is "blank".. it always has some HTML
characters or some character that does not show up.
May be others have had better luck but that has never worked for
us.
Kami
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott
Hi,
Although the IMail services don't have any dependencies I was thinking of
linking some services in order to prevent stuff like this.
I would have Syslog run first, then the Queuemanager and then the other
services. This would for instance automatically stop the SMTP service when
Claiming to be charter one bank.
I have not seen this kind of angle before.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
Protecting the Confidentiality of Our Customers' Information br
Effective February 2005br
br
Charter One Privacy Protection: Our Commitment to You.br
br
Dear
Title: Message
Well -
I HAVE seen blank ones - but those were legitimate Outlook (?) generated
emails for shared folder synchronizations. They had no body, just an
attachment. So I had a fairly high false positive rate.
Best
RegardsAndy SchmidtHM Systems Software,
Inc.600 East Crescent
OK, but the shutdown doesn't happen until 3:00 AM. These messages were
received (and queued, which is the point they SHOULD have been handed
off to Declude) at 9:30 PM. That's a 6 hour window between receipt and
delivery.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Something new: This one actually have descent grammer and speling.
:-)
- Original Message -
From: John Tolmachoff (Lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 11:21 AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] New Phishing scheme
Claiming to be charter
Just noticed this version is posted to Declude's site. It reads -
SPAMHEADER Fix for v176-182
SPAMHEADER Fix for v166-v175
SPAMHEADER Fix Prior v166
Anyone had any experirence with this version?
Thanks,
Cody
***
469.828.4700 ph
469.828.4702 fx
intercityweb.com
Hi all,
I just installed 2.0.5 and when I run declude.exe or declude.exe - diag
I get the message - Key request Initiated.
Declude seems to be running OK and catching viruses, I just wanted to let
you know...
I also tried going back to 2.0.4 and got the same result.
So I went ahead and stayed
Hm...
I have tested their 2.0.4.2 for them - and it DOES fix the crashes that I
had experienced all Friday. I therefore ASSUME that 2.05 is the official
name for what I tested - but obivously don't know this for a fact.
Anyway, Ralph (with Scott's input, from what he said) came through for me
What am I missing - this email failed virtually every test there is G,
it also should have bypassed whitelisting. Yet - at the end it was delivered?
I believe the issue here is that you are using ROUTETO followed by DELETE.
In pre-2.0, the DELETE action deleted the entire E-mail. With v2.0,
17 matches
Mail list logo
