AW: [Declude.JunkMail] bug in jm 2.0.6

2005-05-09 Thread Guhl, Markus \(LDS\)
hi, we did some testing with 2.0.6 and it looks like HOLD [Path]\%DATE% is working fine, but HOLD [Path] is not working any more, at least on our server (it did under 2.0.5 and it is still in the manual). without the %date% the hold action now adresses the standard-holdpath. markus guhl LDSNRW

[Declude.JunkMail] BCC test

2005-05-09 Thread Bonno Bloksma
Hi, I was just looking at the Junkmail manual and noticed the documentation on the BCC test does tell what is does but it does not tell how it is supposed to be confugured. Now as a seasoned Declude user I quickly determined the meaning of the 10 x 5 0 sequence in the default config but

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] BCC test

2005-05-09 Thread Dan Horne
From the manual you referenced: The format of a test definition is the name of the test, followed by the test type, followed by two test-specific pieces of information, followed by two weights: The weight that will be assigned to the test if an E-mail fails the test, and the weight that will be

[Declude.JunkMail] Split headers

2005-05-09 Thread John Carter
While reviewing some held emails, I have seen messages with what I'll call split headers -- as in the normal header lines are at the beginning of the msg file and the Declude headers are the end of the msg file with the msg body in between. My question is will this mess up any test results, esp.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Split headers

2005-05-09 Thread David Franco-Rocha [ Declude ]
John, This problem was reported previously to us and has been corrected in the latest interim release. It is caused by broken mail clients that do not terminate header lines with the required cr/lf sequence. David Franco-Rocha Declude Technical Support - Original Message - From: John