Re: [Declude.JunkMail] FW: [SPAM]Please Restore Your Account Access

2005-09-10 Thread Darin Cox
Title: PayPal Hmmm... it does, though I wouldn't have believed it. What was the REVDNS? Darin. - Original Message - From: Marc Catuogno To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2005 12:06 AM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] FW: [SPAM]Please Restore Your Account

[Declude.JunkMail] Stop Multi-Hop Spam

2005-09-10 Thread Don Brown
What is the best way to catch this multi-hop Spam delivery? 195.146.36.25 is an open relay/proxy. Thanks, Received: from SMTP32-FWD by edataweb.net (SMTP32) id A77D004887CA3; Sat, 10 Sep 2005 01:06:08 -0500 Received: from SMTP32-FWD by edataweb.net (SMTP32) id A77120297027608B8; Sat, 10

[Declude.JunkMail] Switch to smartermail from imail

2005-09-10 Thread Timothy Bohen
Since it seems a lot of people here have gone from imail to smartermail, I'll ask here. My main reason for hating imail seems to be load related? Is smartermail more robust then imail? How hard is to port to smartermail from imail? Thanks __ __ __

[Declude.JunkMail] E-mails getting routed to the SPAM email address that shouldn't

2005-09-10 Thread Michael Graveen
I've just upgraded my Declude Junkmail to version 2.06.16. I'm running into a issue where some emails that DON'T meet the ROUTETO weight are still being routed to my SPAM email address. These are my settings: WEIGHT10WARN WEIGHT14SUBJECT **SPAM** WEIGHT20

[Declude.JunkMail] Declude Support sometimes uses Verizon

2005-09-10 Thread Gary Steiner
I've received a couple replies over time from Declude Support illustrated in the following header: Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 09 20:22:49 2005 Received: from static-68-162-218-198.BOS.east.verizon.net [68.162.218.198] by mail.plusultraweb.com with SMTP; Fri, 9 Sep 2005 20:22:49