RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Reverted to 2.6.11 - FWIW...

2005-10-27 Thread David Barker
Mark, Thank you for this post it is very useful. I am taking this information to our developers to see what else we can find I will let you know as soon as we can possibly identify the problem. The only difference between you and all our other customers is that you have a load balancer doing a

[Declude.JunkMail] Incorrect version number reported by v...12?

2005-10-27 Thread Harry Palmer
It appears that Decludeproc v3.0.5.12 for SmarterMail is displaying its version in the header as v3.0.5.11. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Incorrect version number reported by v...12?

2005-10-27 Thread David Barker
Goto your smartermail directory at the command prompt and type Decludeproc -v Which version are you displaying ? David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harry Palmer Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 10:34 AM To:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Incorrect version number reported by v...12?

2005-10-27 Thread Harry Palmer
The response is: Declude Version 3.0.5.12 - Goto your smartermail directory at the command prompt and type Decludeproc -v Which version are you displaying ? David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harry Palmer Sent: Thursday, October

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Incorrect version number reported by v...12?

2005-10-27 Thread David Barker
Did you stop the service when replacing the executable ? David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harry Palmer Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 11:06 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail]

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Incorrect version number reported by v...12?

2005-10-27 Thread Harry Palmer
Oops - I just restarted the service. It now reports the correct version. Thanks! - Did you stop the service when replacing the executable ? David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harry Palmer Sent: Thursday, October

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Incorrect version number reported by v...12?

2005-10-27 Thread David Barker
Information when upgrading the decludeproc only. (Note xxx is the version of declude.) 1. download the new decludeprocxxx.exe to your \mailserver\ directory 2. Stop the decludeproc service 3. rename your current decludeproc.exe to decludeprocxxx.exe 4. rename the new decludeprocxxx.exe to

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Incorrect version number reported by v...12?

2005-10-27 Thread John T \(Lists\)
David, you need to amend your sequence: Imail SMTP service must be stopped before stopping the Decludeproc service else if a new message is handed to declude.exe and declude.exe finds Decludeproc is not running, it sends a start command. At least this was the case prior to 3.0.5x. John T

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Incorrect version number reported by v...12?

2005-10-27 Thread David Barker
John, This is not the case. The only time the start command is used is with the installer. It is not necessary to stop the SMTP service. All declude.exe will do when receiving a message is move it to the \proc directory, therefore upgrading decludeproc should not effect the operation of Imail

[Declude.JunkMail] OT: Blacklisted by Comcast

2005-10-27 Thread Evans Martin
In the process of preparing to switch from IMail to SmarterMail we had a server with an out of the box SmarterMail install on it for a few days and got blacklisted by Comcast for being an open relay. Everything has been corrected now and we have sent multiple emails to Comcast advising them of the

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Blacklisted by Comcast

2005-10-27 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Evans, No contacts but a thought - you could temporarily gateway the mail through another server outbound that is not blocked. I had to do this for one of my clients who got on AOL's bad side until we squared the issue up with AOL. Not that your on imail, but it has a nice feature to

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Incorrect version number reported by v...12?

2005-10-27 Thread John T \(Lists\)
Then what was causing the Decludeproc service to start in early versions of 3.0.x during testing of the problems with certain spam messages that were causing crashes? This was before the /review directory was added. I will have to go back to my notes late tonight to see what version this was.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Incorrect version number reported by v...12?

2005-10-27 Thread David Barker
The auto recover on the services tab. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (Lists) Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 2:27 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Incorrect version

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Country filter broken in 3.05.05?

2005-10-27 Thread David Barker
The COUNTRY issue was corrected in 3.0.5.9 David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Heimir Eidskrem Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 3:05 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Country filter

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Incorrect version number reported by v...12?

2005-10-27 Thread John T \(Lists\)
Before that was set. John T eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 11:36 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Incorrect

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Country filter broken in 3.05.05?

2005-10-27 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Heimir, Yes, that is a known issue of that version. Also, in case you have not noticed MAILFROM is also broken in that version. You need to upgrade to a later version. 3.0.5.9 is the release where it is fixed. Darrell

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Country filter broken in 3.05.05?

2005-10-27 Thread Heimir Eidskrem
Our service agreement expired but I still have broken product. That suck... Now im sad :) David Barker wrote: The COUNTRY issue was corrected in 3.0.5.9 David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Heimir Eidskrem

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Country filter broken in 3.05.05?

2005-10-27 Thread David Barker
Heimir, You know I am not going to resist saying this. http://www.declude.com/Purchase.asp?cat=13 David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Heimir Eidskrem Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 4:08 PM To:

[Declude.JunkMail] Headers in Body or at End of Message

2005-10-27 Thread David Franco-Rocha [Declude]
We are preparing to test an algorithm to eliminate the problem whereby headers were inserted into the body of a message or at the end of the message. If you have any examples of emails like these, please send them as attachments to [EMAIL PROTECTED]. We would like to run as many as possible

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Country filter broken in 3.05.05?

2005-10-27 Thread Heimir Eidskrem
Oh, I know. I would be disappointed if you didn't. I hope you noticed my smiley face. David Barker wrote: Heimir, You know I am not going to resist saying this. http://www.declude.com/Purchase.asp?cat=13 David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Declude.JunkMail] Headers in Body or at End of Message

2005-10-27 Thread David Franco-Rocha [Declude]
We are preparing to test an algorithm to eliminate the problem whereby headers were inserted into the body of a message or at the end of the message. If you have any examples of emails like these, please send them as attachments to support at declude.com. We would like to run as many as