RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail 3 / Declude 4

2006-03-10 Thread John T \(Lists\)
Well, although I know nothing about SmarterMail, I believe I remember talk that AUTOWHITELIST was not working properly and was supposed to be fixed but then they changed something and possibly Declude then had to change something for it to work again. John T eServices For You Seek, and ye shall

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail 3 / Declude 4

2006-03-10 Thread Jay Sudowski - Handy Networks LLC
Per a direct email to me, AUTOWHITELIST cobbles together the path for a user's XML file by taking the settings for SmarterMail's default 'domain path', not the actual 'domain path' that exists in the SmarterMail configuration for the domain. This is a huge problem if you run servers with mail

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail 3 / Declude 4

2006-03-10 Thread Rick Baranowski
If this is true this is a big problem for use too. Because we use Imail (getting ready to move to SM3) and the path for the emails are in the users root folder x:\webspace\reseller\user\domain.com\special\ Rick -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On

[Declude.JunkMail] OT: SPAM from Invariant Systems.

2006-03-10 Thread John T \(Lists\)
I am posting this here to publicly shame them with intent. Invariant Systems is in the same business as most of us are. They also happen to sell a couple of apps that work well for Declude. Today they sent out to the lists that we who have purchased their software to work with Declude marketing

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: SPAM from Invariant Systems.

2006-03-10 Thread Kevin Bilbee
John was an email that looked like it was from their system. The spam received was not from Invarient Systems. It also was not delivered from their server. It did have headers consistant with invariants list server and that is why I received it. It seems the email spoofed invariants list server

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: SPAM from Invariant Systems.

2006-03-10 Thread gbirdsall
What message are you talking about? I didn't get anything from Invariant Systems. - greg I am posting this here to publicly shame them with intent. Invariant Systems is in the same business as most of us are. They also happen to sell a couple of apps that work well for Declude. Today they

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: SPAM from Invariant Systems.

2006-03-10 Thread Erik
John, Darrell caught the SPAM and removed them from his list. They are/were a customer of Invariant Systems products and subed to his lists just like you and I do. They posted to the list. But Darrell was quick to take action. -Erik -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: SPAM from Invariant Systems.

2006-03-10 Thread John T \(Lists\)
OK, I have calmed down now. It has been a very hectic day, and it is by far not over yet. Yes, it did indeed come through their server. However, it was sent by a list member, which I understand Darrell has removed. In my haste dealing with multiple things at once I mistakenly took the message

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: SPAM from Invariant Systems.

2006-03-10 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
John, Actually shame on you. Had you did any bit of researching and asking before opening your mouth you mouth you would have found out the following facts: Innovation Networks is a subscriber of several of our lists. They inadvertently entered the email address of our list that they are a

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: SPAM from Invariant Systems.

2006-03-10 Thread Erik
John should adhere to his tag line: Seek, and ye shall find! ;-) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Sent: Saturday, March 11, 2006 12:31 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT:

[Declude.JunkMail] OT: Microsoft Open License

2006-03-10 Thread Matt
I'm considering changing over to Microsoft's Open License program, but I haven't actually spoken to a reseller yet about the terms. I'm hoping that someone here could give me an idea about the prices that one would pay for Windows 2003 Standard and MS SQL 2000 for around 5 to 10 total

re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Microsoft Open License

2006-03-10 Thread Shayne Embry
Matt,I think as you continue your investigation you'll find that Microsoft states the only type of "legal" licensing for hosting services is the Service Providers License. We discovered this not-so-well publicized fact last year. It requires a monthly licensing fee. I won't go into all the

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Microsoft Open License

2006-03-10 Thread Kevin Bilbee
Matt I think you may be looking for this http://www.microsoft.com/serviceproviders/programs/windowswebhosting.mspx Kevin Bilbee -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Shayne EmbrySent: Friday, March 10, 2006 5:19 PMTo: