Robert,
I think that did a good amount of research and I do in fact have my
facts straight. It appears rather that you just simply didn't read my
message fully.
At this moment, SPLA isn't a good deal for me, though I recognize that
in some situations it can be.
I like to buy full retail ver
Actually, SPLA is what fuels part of that market. There are many
datacenters out there that will basically lease you a server for a
fixed price and give you unlimited everything and all hardware,
hardware support (and some software support), and they all do SPLA for
Windows boxes. They approa
Unfortunately not. Remember,
that’s a shared sql server account – not a dedicated sql server for
$9.95/month. If somebody wants to put 500 sql accounts on a single Celeron
server, well, caveat emptor.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John T (Lists
Matt, get the facts before you “rant”.
If you are running a business then
you should be adhering to the rules. I can’t believe you have been
hosting sites/email services for so long and not been aware of SPLA.
I think your rant is totally
offbase. Let me give you (and others lurki
On the one hand, if it that was upheld
as true as you say and enforceable, do you think that would help get rid of all
those fly-by-night hosting companies out there offering unlimited this and
unlimited that with a SQL backend for $9.95 per month?
John T
eServices For You
"Seek
John,
I haven't looked at the SQL Server license, but the Windows 2003 Server
Standard Edition license states:
"Renting, leasing, or lending the Software (including providing
commercial hosting services) is also prohibited."
It makes no difference as to who's software you are using on to
Craig,
I don't know whether or not you figured this out, but it is somewhat
rare that someone from Declude posts to this list, and most of the
conversations are between fellow administrators and can span a wide
range of topics. Even you are guilty of this:
http://www.mail-archive.com/dec
Um requesting read receipts of a list is
un-professional.
If you notice in the subject line the
OT: you can then if you desire to create a rule in your Outlook based on that.
John T
eServices For You
"Seek, and ye shall
find!"
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL
That is where the question comes in. I
am not hosting a client or providing a client a service on a server.
I have listened in on a conversation
between a big client of mine and a lawyer and the lawyer’s thought is
that I am providing a package product, in one case a web and e-mail ho
The popular understanding is exactly the opposite in fact, but even
Microsoft's own reps don't always tell it the same way.
The fact is that anyone hosting "clients" is violating the standard
EULA on Windows since they made that change, and SPLA is required.
Whether or not that is enforceable
um I thought this was a junk mail list aimed at
discussing Declude?
I did not know it was to rant about Microsoft
stuff?
Kindest RegardsCraig Edmonds123
Marbella InternetW: www.123marbella.comE : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[
Matt, my understanding is that is the
server is hosting multiple web sites for multiple clients, and therefore is not
dedicated to any one client, the SPLA does not apply. If a server is dedicated
for one client, whether that server be for web sites, SQL, ACT, Quickbooks,
whatever, then th
David,
I would verify that the Declude logs show these messages. If it is the
issue with formatting, then Declude should still be logging them. My
guess is that this didn't fail enough tests to trigger HOLD, DELETE or
ROUTETO on your system, and due to the headers probably appearing in
the b
Shayne (and Kevin),
Rant = on
I see now that under the SPLA program, they seem to indicate in a very
round-about way that you have to use SPLA, in fact, you have to
purchase a separate license per processor for anonymous access to IIS
over the Internet. What a crock of s#*t that is. This is
John, good point, didn't "catch" that ... yep, Declude is missing them all ... -Original Message-From: "John Carter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Sent 3/11/2006 10:25:47 AMTo: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Why Are these Messages Not being scanned?This may not be the prob
This may not be the problem, but I don't remember seeing TO, FROM etc lines
appearing before the "Received: from" line, except in msgs sent internal to
Imail. Every header I've seen started with Received:. (I guess it can happen.
Does here.) Could this be a case of broken client/headers messin
For several days I've been getting spam from several ip's basically
all looking the same in the headers and body, except for the received
IP address.
What I can't figure out, why is it not being scanned by Declude. I
normally see in all of my message headers, the declude scan
information
17 matches
Mail list logo
