[Declude.JunkMail] automated response

2007-08-21 Thread Troy D. Hilton
I will be out of the office on August 22nd, 2007. If you need immediate help please call the office at 302-529-8640 and ask for Greg Kelso. I will respond to all emails when I return. Troy Hilton Serveon, Inc. 302-529-8640 [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail maili

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ED Spam

2007-08-21 Thread John Olden
Expresso by Ultrapico. http://www.ultrapico.com/Expresso.htm I found an old copy of version 1 online and it's kind of old and a little clunky but it does what I need it to do. Maybe I'll try v3 someday. Another online tester I found today is located at http://www.fileformat.info/tool/regex.htm

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ED Spam

2007-08-21 Thread David Barker
Which tester do you use? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Olden Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2007 3:39 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ED Spam My bad. When I pasted the expression into a tester I have, it failed because of

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ED Spam

2007-08-21 Thread John Olden
My bad. When I pasted the _expression_ into a tester I have, it failed because of the line wrap after the "d". Putting it all on one line works. Duh. Thanks again, John Olden David Barker wrote: This does match M eg ad ik as you have described below -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ED Spam

2007-08-21 Thread David Barker
This does match M eg ad ik as you have described below -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Olden Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2007 2:34 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ED Spam Better but it didn't take lon

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ED Spam

2007-08-21 Thread John Olden
Better but it didn't take long for me to get another that won't pass this test: M eg ad ik John Olden David Barker wrote: Try this ... (?i:\b(?!dick?)(m(\W?|_){0,3}e(\W?|_){0,3}g(\W?|_){0,[EMAIL PROTECTED])?(\W?|_){0,3}d(\ W?|_){0,3}[|li1í!](\W?|_){0,3}[ck]{1,2}\b) Will match on obfuscated

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ED Spam

2007-08-21 Thread David Barker
Try this ... (?i:\b(?!dick?)(m(\W?|_){0,3}e(\W?|_){0,3}g(\W?|_){0,[EMAIL PROTECTED])?(\W?|_){0,3}d(\ W?|_){0,3}[|li1í!](\W?|_){0,3}[ck]{1,2}\b) Will match on obfuscated dick (ie. D!ck) but NOT dick, can include mega obfuscated. David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto

[Declude.JunkMail] ED Spam

2007-08-21 Thread John Olden
I'm still a little green on the regular expressions. I added the following to my filters and it has been doing good. BODY100PCRE m[\s_\.-]?(=2e)?e[\s_.-]?(=2e)?g[\s_.-]?(=2e)?a[\s_.-]?(=2e)?d[\s_.-]?(=2e)?i[\s_.-]?(=2e)?k but it doesn't catch Me - ga - Di k Any suggestions on

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Upgrade to version 4 causes processor to skyrocket

2007-08-21 Thread Kevin Stanford
I just kept the "generic" setting that came with the default global.cfg (found in the resource directory) and added sniffer and the country filter. I have checked but it appears that I am not running the virus scanner that is part of version 4. Also we have several users complaining that they are

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Upgrade to version 4 causes processor to skyrocket

2007-08-21 Thread Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
What are your settings in your declude.cfg file. Are you still using the same setting in that file from Version 3? Has your mail volume increased? Darrell Kevin Stanford wrote: Hi all, Since upgrading to Declude Version 4 (from version 3) my processor has really taken a hit (runs about 90-

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Upgrade to version 4 causes processor to skyrocket

2007-08-21 Thread David Barker
Version 4.x has built in AVG which is an additional virus scanner depending on your previous virus configuration this would be a good place to start. David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Stanford Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2007 10:16

[Declude.JunkMail] Upgrade to version 4 causes processor to skyrocket

2007-08-21 Thread Kevin Stanford
Hi all, Since upgrading to Declude Version 4 (from version 3) my processor has really taken a hit (runs about 90-100%). I used the default Global.cfg file and just moved over the Whitelist stuff as well as a few rules that I have. Looking at the Task Manager is consistently shows decludeproc.exe r

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] New Spam

2007-08-21 Thread David Barker
Thanks :) Much appreciated. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of SJ.Stanaitis Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2007 9:57 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] New Spam Just something I've been meaning to say for a bit. D