Re: [Declude.JunkMail] white list or positive weight for a specific To address?

2011-06-19 Thread IMail Admin
“It is just our way.” That has such a Zen sound to it, like you must find your own path to enlightenment. I am still confused by both your suggestion and Randy’s. They both seem to be based on the From line, which would not be declude.com. Here are the first few header lines from one of

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] white list or positive weight for a specific To address?

2011-06-19 Thread Rick Davidson
Why not use the HELO or REVDNS? REVDNS is going to be the safest because of the difficulty in forging it HELO -10 CONTAINS smtp.declude.com or HELO WHITELIST CONTAINS smtp.declude.com REVDNS -10 CONTAINS smtp.declude.com or REVDNS WHITELIST CONTAINS smtp.declude.com or even blanket the headers

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] white list or positive weight for a specific To address?

2011-06-19 Thread Sanford Whiteman
Why not use the HELO or REVDNS? REVDNS is going to be the safest because of the difficulty in forging it Not always... if the domain has a hard-fail SPF record that isn't *itself* dependent on forgeable records (only uses IPs and forward DNS entries), then the MAILFROM can't