[Declude.JunkMail] Imail recommendations (OT)

Sorry if this is OT, but we are about to replace our NT4 mail server and I am looking for a quick recommendation. We have Imail V 8.0, but no current support agreement from Ipswitch. Question: Is the upgrade to 8.2 worth the $695 for a support agreement? Why? Additional info: ~20 domains ~500

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail recommendations (OT)

Of Sanford Whiteman Sent: Monday, July 18, 2005 4:35 PM To: David Fletcher Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail recommendations (OT) Not expecting a lot in the way of growth That's really the key. You're sort of saying I'm perfectly satisfied. Am I satisfied? This is why gathering (or even

[Declude.JunkMail] OT: Attachment sizes

head when I saw this one after hearing the question: Why is my Outlook locking up?) What limits do you all use? Thanks for the input. David Fletcher InfoTech International, LLC. (904)338-9234 -- Awk! Pieces of eight. Pieces of eight. Pieces of seven... ERROR: General Protection Fault. [Paroty Error

[Declude.JunkMail] Bogus Date header

Name: XXX X-Note: Sender IP Address: X X-Note: Sender Country ID: X-Note: Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 12:17:12 -0400 X-RCPT-TO: XXX Status: R X-UIDL: 390996653 David Fletcher InfoTech International, LLC. (904)338-9234 -- Awk! Pieces of eight. Pieces of eight. Pieces of seven

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Bogus Date header

Thanks. I just wanted to be sure. -Original Message- From: R. Scott Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 3:10 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Bogus Date header I am trying to help out the admin of another server by showing him

[Declude.JunkMail] spamcop?

Has spamcop stopped working? I'm not seeing any reference to it in my logs now (set to mid) or headers. --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] spamcop?

Good call, Scott. I don't think any of these tests are showing up right now. I'm going to bump up the logging and take a better look. OSSRC ip4rrelays.osirusoft.com127.0.0.4 16 0 SPAMCOP ip4rbl.spamcop.net 127.0.0.2 16 0 JAPAN

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] spamcop?

More info: Debug gives me these lines: 07/07/2003 13:10:54 Qa9930eca013e736e Test 1-SPAMCOP didn't get a response. 07/07/2003 13:10:54 Qa9930eca013e736e Test 2-JAPAN didn't get a response. 07/07/2003 13:10:54 Qa9930eca013e736e Test 3-MONKEYFORMMAIL didn't get a response. 07/07/2003 13:10:54

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] spamcop?

We're using our internet provider's DNS server. It seems to work, but I don't know how to test it for the types of queries declude uses. nslookup works fine. -- David FletcherInfoTech International, LLC. (904)338-9234 (904)721-1253 fax http://www.ITI-InfoTech.com Any event, once

RE: * [Declude.JunkMail] Declude JunkMail v1.68 (beta) released

You could always reverse it and set the number of characters really low and add a negative weight if it failed. ;) Not that that would be any more useful, but it is nice to have a product that's so flexible. __ David Fletcher InfoTech International, LLC

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Where I'm At Now and Where Should I Be Going?

Speaking of SPAMCOP, one option would be to increase the weight that that test applies. Then you will block mail that fails that test and another, but pass mail that fails only that test. YMMV __ David Fletcher InfoTech International, LLC. (904)338

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] FW: Exim error message (X-RBL-Warning..)

? __ David Fletcher InfoTech International, LLC. (904)338-9234 (904)721-1253 fax http://www.ITI-InfoTech.com __ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Markus Gufler Sent: Monday

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] [IMail Forum] May Spam Statistics

. -Scott Thanks, David __ David Fletcher InfoTech International, LLC. (904)721-0867 (904)721-1253 fax http://www.iti-infotech.com (business) http://www.mahonri.org (personal