Is there anyway in which Declude could be set to not show this as 2, but 1?
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 12:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] X-Note: Number Recipient(s): 2?
All messages show the
All messages show the following headers (intentional):
X-Note: Number Recipient(s): 2
X-Note: Recipient(s): [EMAIL PROTECTED]
But the curious item is why does it show 2 recipients? We do use the Copy
All account from time to time. Is this what it is picking up on, and just
not showing?
---
Perhaps all of us Declude junkies out there would be willing to run your
web-server code on our unused bandwidth as peers -- that is unless you've
built something completely proprietary!
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May
Anything to be aware of when going from IMail Ver 6.06 on NT 4, to IMail Ver
8 on 2000?
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
- Original Message -
From: Tom Baker | Netsmith Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 3:14 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Sniffer
Sniffer is great, Declude is great, they compliment each other great!
What is Sniffer?
---
[This E-mail
I wonder if that was our problem yesterday.
We had a few messages sent to our a list of 800 and a list of 1200. I
didn't recall seeing any .LST files, however it took more than 2 hours to
send out the message -- whereas in the past those two lists seemed to send
everything within 5 minutes.
Does Declude Junkmail work with aliases and lists, or just users?
We have a small group of users, that are tied to a list -- and are
indicating they are receiving considerable amount of junkmail.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This
de.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] 99% CPU NOT the case with v1.26-interimB
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 19:07:23 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express
of messaging?
- Original Message -
From: Jack Taugher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 7:10 PM
de.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] 99% CPU NOT the case with v1.26-interimB
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 19:07:23 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type
I downgraded from v1.25a to v1.24. This morning, 20 minutes ago, Declude
was at 99% utilization.
- Original Message -
As I've stated several times: I'm not getting an error message, no files
are
being created and no event log messages. (I'll double check my gigantic
log
files to be
As I've stated several times: I'm not getting an error message, no files are
being created and no event log messages. (I'll double check my gigantic log
files to be sure of the first..)
Our prior version was v1.20
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
It has successfully not happened since yesterday 26 hours ago, however what
I would see is that the mailserver would be at 100% utilization. Upon
popping up Task Manager, Declude.exe would be at 99% or 100% utilization.
The memory of the system has never been over 72000K/377368K, even at that
12 matches
Mail list logo
