It's a shame because I was catching a great deal more spam, but I may have
to back off on the weight of this test. This looks like a log file that one
guy has e-mailed from a D-link router. Why don't companies have this stuff
compliant. sigh
Received: from DI-604 [65.41.30.4] by
There's not even a date header in that message. What would an E-mail
client even do with that? 1969?
I probably switched from Scott's methodologies very early on, requiring
a message to fail BADHEADERS, SPAMHEADERS (combined score of 8) plus at
least one other test before it gets rejected
