[Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test

2005-04-12 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Is anyone using the DYNHELO test in Declude - if so do you have any information on it? What specifically is it looking for? False positive rate?I found it in the new global.cfg file, but did not see any references to it in the manual. Also, for the BCC test any thoughts on what the

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test

2005-04-12 Thread David Barker
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 1:12 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test Is anyone using the DYNHELO test in Declude - if so do you have any information

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test

2005-04-12 Thread Nick
On 12 Apr 2005 at 13:16, David Barker wrote: Hi David, BCC bcc 10 x 5 0 This test type, checks to see if there are more than X known BCC:'s I think Darrell's question was related to optimum setting rather than functionality. -Nick --- This E-mail came from the

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test

2005-04-12 Thread Kami Razvan
] DYNHELO Test Is anyone using the DYNHELO test in Declude - if so do you have any information on it? What specifically is it looking for? False positive rate?I found it in the new global.cfg file, but did not see any references to it in the manual. Also, for the BCC test any thoughts

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test

2005-04-12 Thread David Barker
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test On 12 Apr 2005 at 13:16, David Barker wrote: Hi David, BCC bcc 10 x 5 0 This test type, checks to see if there are more than X known BCC:'s I think Darrell's question was related to optimum setting rather than

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test

2005-04-12 Thread Kami Razvan
: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 2:07 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test Kami, Excellent point - what would you combo this with? Darrell Kami Razvan writes: Darrell.. The BCC test to me is scary if used by itself- I can see it being used

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test

2005-04-12 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
at your organization. Andrew 8) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kami Razvan Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 11:21 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test Hi Darrell: I have a number tests like

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test

2005-04-12 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test Any feedback on these tests and performance will be appreciated here is some info on these tests. BCC bcc 10 x 5 0 This test type, checks to see if there are more than X known BCC:'s for this E-mail (where X is the first test-type-specific piece

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test

2005-04-12 Thread Scott Fisher
- From: Kami Razvan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 12:33 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test Darrell.. The BCC test to me is scary if used by itself- I can see it being used as a combo test but alone with any weight is not something I

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test

2005-04-12 Thread Nick
On 12 Apr 2005 at 11:38, Colbeck, Andrew wrote: I've found the new DYNHELO test to be quite useful and I've subsequently stopped using Bud's free external tool (HELOisIP from http://bud.thedurlands.com/ ). Thanks Andrew - [sorry Bud} I will follow your lead and do the same - -Nick ---

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test

2005-04-12 Thread Andy Schmidt
PROTECTED]) Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 01:12 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test Is anyone using the DYNHELO test in Declude - if so do you have any information on it? What specifically is it looking for? False positive rate?I found

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test

2005-04-12 Thread Scott Fisher
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test Hm - I looked at http://www.declude.com/Version/Manuals/2.0.6.asp - but don't find any DYNHELO? Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax:+1 201 934-9206 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test

2005-04-12 Thread Andy Schmidt
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test I noted in in the global.cfg file for 2.06. I believe these tests to be new: DYNHELO dynhelo x x 7 0 ENCODEDURL encodedurl x x 1 0 IPURL ipurl x x 2 0 --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test

2005-04-12 Thread Kami Razvan
http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=151 Regards, - Kami -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 3:35 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test Hm - I looked

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test

2005-04-12 Thread Dan Horne
Why is IPURL listed as Currently N/A ? Not Applicable? To what? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kami Razvan Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 4:14 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test http

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test

2005-04-12 Thread Andy Schmidt
@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test Why is IPURL listed as Currently N/A ? Not Applicable? To what? --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test

2005-04-12 Thread Dan Horne
Is it available now? Is it working in 2.0.6? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 5:16 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test Probably meant not available

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test

2005-04-12 Thread David Barker
www.declude.com - Original Message - From: Colbeck, Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 5:50 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test From my own experimentation, I'd say that as of today in v2.0.6 DYNHELO is definitely working