Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 1.80 and e-mail notifications

2004-09-29 Thread R. Scott Perry
> Thanks for pointing that out -- it should be fixed now. Does this mean we need to do something on our end or retreive an interim? No, it was entirely on our end. -Scott --- Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 1.80 and e-mail notifications

2004-09-29 Thread Nick Hayer
On 28 Sep 2004 at 16:58, R. Scott Perry wrote: Scott - > Thanks for pointing that out -- it should be fixed now. Does this mean we need to do something on our end or retreive an interim? Thanks -Nick The format > used for the forging virus lookups was changed, and we had to also > make a ch

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 1.80 and e-mail notifications

2004-09-28 Thread Kaj Søndergaard Laursen
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. > Scott Perry > > Thanks for pointing that out -- it should be fixed now. The > format used for the forging virus lookups was changed, and we > had to also make a change on our end to reflect

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 1.80 and e-mail notifications

2004-09-28 Thread R. Scott Perry
Just upgraded to 1.80, and checked the configuration. Everything seems to be working except that I noticed that I got no notifications of the test Eicar-virus e-mails I sent to myself after upgrading. Just sent Eicarplain base 64 MIME enocoded mails from http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=9

[Declude.JunkMail] Declude 1.80 and e-mail notifications

2004-09-28 Thread Kaj Søndergaard Laursen
Hi Just upgraded to 1.80, and checked the configuration. Everything seems to be working except that I noticed that I got no notifications of the test Eicar-virus e-mails I sent to myself after upgrading. Just sent Eicarplain base 64 MIME enocoded mails from http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?