-
DB> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell
DB> ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
DB> Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 10:26 AM
DB> To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
DB> Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ?
DB> David,
DB> Are comp
> I would not attempt to convert/port from any other existing language
> (unless I had experts in both languages), I would simply start with
> the existing specifications and develop original code (in my
> programming language of choice) to those specs...
You're quite right!
And it doe
ssage -
From: "Sanford Whiteman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Bill Landry"
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 3:13 PM
Subject: Re[6]: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ?
Razor has always been "free", even during that very short timeframe
of l
> Razor has always been "free", even during that very short timeframe
> of like 6 months where they were considering charging for usage if
> you were using Razor in a revenue based model. However, as you
> probably know, that was very short lived and quickly reverted back
> to just plain
: Re[6]: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ?
David,
There was quite a discussion about three weeks ago about this, as a number
of critical posts were not making it to the list, but other posts were. It
could be that you were having intermittent problems with the list, but it
censored. To
say Sandy was being paranoid is to belittle the observations of Sandy and a
number of others.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: "David Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 4:50 PM
Subject: RE: Re[6]: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 -
> There was a time period of about 3 days when the lists were having
> problems on our end as we were in the middle of a server migration /
> email server migration / and a major office relocation. I am sure it
> is this time you are referring too. But to be honest Sandy
> "censorship"
I thought this was due to a glitch in the transition from IMail to
SmarterMail at Declude.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Sanford Whiteman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "David Barker"
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 1:49 PM
Subject: Re[6]: [Declude.JunkMail] Dec
ff and their capabilities
than I do, so I'll admit that I could be wrong...
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Sanford Whiteman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Bill Landry"
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 1:47 PM
Subject: Re[4]: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commto
little too
paranoid :)
David B
www.declude.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sanford
Whiteman
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 4:50 PM
To: David Barker
Subject: Re[6]: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ?
> If you have l
> If you have logs you can send me I will be glad to look at what
> happened for you.
I will see if I have them around. Main question is, "Why were posts
getting silently dropped about a month or so ago?" There's no question
that they were getting dropped. Other people reported this as wel
> Just as SA and other spam apps have built in support for these
> freely available and open source spam services, nothing would have
> prevented Declude from doing the same.
Don't agree. Have you ever looked at the Rhyolite lists and looked at
Vernon's opinion of commercial DCC sofware
ndry"
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 12:42 PM
Subject: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ?
I guess what I am getting at here is that there are lots of "free"
choices/options/solutions available out there without having to
resort to pricey and convolute
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sanford
Whiteman
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 4:06 PM
To: David Barker
Subject: Re[4]: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ?
> This is totally untrue and unsubstantiated. We have NEVER censored
> these lists.
I can "s
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sanford
Whiteman
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 4:06 PM
To: David Barker
Subject: Re[4]: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ?
> This is totally untrue and unsubstantiated. We have NE
> This is totally untrue and unsubstantiated. We have NEVER censored
> these lists.
I can "substantiate" using mail server logs from 3 successive days
that posts that contained purely technical content were passed to the
list exploder, while messages that contained passages questioning
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sanford
Whiteman
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 3:43 PM
To: Bill Landry
Subject: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ?
> I guess what I am getting at here is that there are lots of "free"
> choices/options/soluti
> I guess what I am getting at here is that there are lots of "free"
> choices/options/solutions available out there without having to
> resort to pricey and convoluted options like CommTouch.
Bill, to be fair, DCC is plenty convoluted itself, if you follow the
requirement to run your
PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 10:19 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ?
Sound like Cloudmark (http://www.cloudmark.com/) and their free Razor
service (http://razor.sourceforge.net/), which I have already been using
successfully for a few years
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 10:41 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ?
Is this how the AV part of the program works and will it run when the other
AV scanners run or is it only run once and
ly 19, 2006 9:33 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ?
Darrell,
1. Are components of the message hashed and some type of hash is sent to
CommTouch for analysis?
RPD extracts 2 types of patterns from the message, Distribution Patterns
(from the header), and St
www.declude.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 10:26 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ?
David,
Are components of the message
: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 7:32 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ?
Also, to piggy back on this - we would like to know exactly how this works.
Is something downloaded to your system is it DNS based etc?
Darrell
10:11 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ?
Darrell,
It is not a DNS test. Commtouch analyzes large volumes of Internet traffic
in real time. New spam and Malware outbreaks are identified as soon as they
emerge, and recorded in the
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 7:32 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ?
Also, to piggy back on this - we would like to know exactly how this works.
Is something downloaded to
@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ?
Also, to piggy back on this - we would like to know exactly how this works.
Is something downloaded to your system is it DNS based etc?
Darrell
. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG
Integration, and Log Parsers.
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Fisher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 5:26 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ?
-David,
Just curious is there a free one-month test drive option for CommTouch or
something similiar?
As one of those pesky non-ISP's the $195 a year is pretty reasonable, but
I'd really like to test drive it before I buy it.
Not to be offensive, but I have no belief of the "100% no false pos
28 matches
Mail list logo
