RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude with SmarterMail 3.0

2005-10-31 Thread Kevin Bilbee
BeckstromSent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 8:44 PMTo: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude with SmarterMail 3.0 Matt, SMTP Auth on port 587 is exactly why I called them last week. I recommend that everyone email [EMAIL PROTECTED] requesting

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude with SmarterMail 3.0

2005-10-31 Thread Dave Beckstrom
for putting antispam gateways in front of smartermail. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Bilbee Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 2:04 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude with SmarterMail 3.0 You can

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude with SmarterMail 3.0

2005-10-31 Thread Kevin Bilbee
are required here. Kevin Bilbee -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Dave BeckstromSent: Monday, October 31, 2005 7:24 AMTo: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude with SmarterMail 3.0 Kevin

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude with SmarterMail 3.0

2005-10-31 Thread Dave Beckstrom
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Bilbee Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 10:44 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude with SmarterMail 3.0 Yes but you were not clear in the post I was responding to. So I thought I would

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude with SmarterMail 3.0

2005-10-31 Thread Kevin Bilbee
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Dave BeckstromSent: Monday, October 31, 2005 8:58 AMTo: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude with SmarterMail 3.0 Kevin, I didnt post verbatim to this list what I sent to smartertools. I assumed this audience here

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude with SmarterMail 3.0

2005-10-31 Thread Dave Beckstrom
: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude with SmarterMail 3.0 There are all levels of userh on this list from the people that probably know more that IPSwitch about email standards and thoes that are extreamly new to email. So specifics IMO are required. Kevin Bilbee -Original

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude with SmarterMail 3.0

2005-10-31 Thread Dave Doherty
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 8:56 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude with SmarterMail 3.0 My own initial experience with their technical support was also less than appealing, in fact I was a bit angry about how it was handled. The person really wasn't too interested

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude with SmarterMail 3.0

2005-10-31 Thread Matt Robertson
I'm really surprised. My experience with SmarterTools has been nothing short of stellar. I've had two separate instances over the last year or so where I've had problems that a tech has made it his personal business to work through with me. One was a nightmarish install of a gateway in front of

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude with SmarterMail 3.0

2005-10-31 Thread Dave Doherty
I guess it depends on who you get. I'm glad to hear that others have has better experiences with them. -Dave - Original Message - From: Matt Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 3:58 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude with SmarterMail 3.0

2005-10-30 Thread IMail Admin
yes, but I've been waiting all year for SM 3.0, with no end in site. Ben - Original Message - From: Markus Gufler [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 8:02 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude with SmarterMail 3.0 Nice to know! Now

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude with SmarterMail 3.0

2005-10-30 Thread Dave Beckstrom
:25 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude with SmarterMail 3.0 yes, but I've been waiting all year for SM 3.0, with no end in site. Ben - Original Message - From: Markus Gufler [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Friday

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude with SmarterMail 3.0

2005-10-30 Thread Evans Martin
Of IMail Admin Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 1:25 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude with SmarterMail 3.0 yes, but I've been waiting all year for SM 3.0, with no end in site. Ben - Original Message - From: Markus Gufler [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude with SmarterMail 3.0

2005-10-30 Thread Matt
] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dave Beckstrom Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 12:15 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude with SmarterMail 3.0 I called smartertools last week to tell them that we needed "submission port 587" support i

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude with SmarterMail 3.0

2005-10-30 Thread Dave Beckstrom
for it. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 7:56 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude with SmarterMail 3.0 My own initial experience with their technical support was also less than appealing, in fact I

[Declude.JunkMail] Declude with SmarterMail 3.0

2005-10-28 Thread David Franco-Rocha [ Declude ]
The 3.0 version of SmarterMail, yet to be released, will pass authentication information to Declude. For those of you who have been patiently waiting to implement WHITELIST AUTH with SmarterMail, please be advised that Declude will support that functionality with SmarterMail 3.0. David

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude with SmarterMail 3.0

2005-10-28 Thread Markus Gufler
: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude with SmarterMail 3.0 The 3.0 version of SmarterMail, yet to be released, will pass authentication information to Declude. For those of you who have been patiently waiting to implement WHITELIST AUTH with SmarterMail, please be advised that Declude will support