RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter processing time.

2002-12-12 Thread John Tolmachoff
Or, in other words, Was the filtering written in a way that the performance could easily be improved?. Ah, yes. Given the way it is currently set up, it probably could be improved a bit. However, from what I've heard, it is much more efficient than the IMail filters. And, we haven't

[Declude.JunkMail] Filter processing time.

2002-12-11 Thread John Tolmachoff
While do some testing with Junkmail in DEBUG mode, I noticed about 3 lines for each filter line in a filter test. How effective is Declude in doing say a 50 line filter test as compared to a program that is doing a filter test of the same configuration? John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA IT Manager,

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter processing time.

2002-12-11 Thread R. Scott Perry
While do some testing with Junkmail in DEBUG mode, I noticed about 3 lines for each filter line in a filter test. How effective is Declude in doing say a 50 line filter test as compared to a program that is doing a filter test of the same configuration? If you are using the debug mode, it

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter processing time.

2002-12-11 Thread John Tolmachoff
If you are using the debug mode, it will be very ineffective. Not in debug mode, but general. I only noticed it in debug. John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA IT Manager, Network Engineer RelianceSoft, Inc. Fullerton, CA 92835 www.reliancesoft.com --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter processing time.

2002-12-11 Thread Sanford Whiteman
John, How effective is Declude in doing say a 50 line filter test as compared to a program that is doing a filter test of the same configuration? A little vague, no? How good is IMail at SMTP deliveries, compared to my proprietary MTA? -Sandy --- [This E-mail was scanned