Title: Filter text: out of the frying pan and into the fire
I think the processing order of the filter text has changed between JunkMail v1.65 and v1.66i. Specifically, I saw high scores on an innocent message due to my spam hint rule.
What I intended to do was search for obfuscation
Hi Scott:
If he is referring to what we have on the list- then it is this:
BODY 10 CONTAINS www%2e
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Kami
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 8:57 AM
To: [EMAIL
(ahem) Errr. Never mind.
I jumped the gun. My innocent sample(s) was using both www.example.com
as well as the escaped version of . and for / in their URLs. In my
haste to make things right, I only saw the normal text URLs.
The message I saw held fell in to two categories: the newsletter
