PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mark MItchell
| Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 10:51 PM
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Handling Held Spams
|
|
| Hello,
|
| I was wondering how people handle all the held spam? From
| my estimates, my mailserver is holding over 1 million spams
Do you delete automatically ?
If so, how ?
Cris
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Madscientist
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 9:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Handling Held Spams
We delete held spam after 30
VBS Scripting...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Cris Porter
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 10:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Handling Held Spams
Do you delete automatically ?
If so, how ?
Cris
Hello,
I was wondering how people handle all the held spam? From my estimates,
my mailserver is holding over 1 million spams per month. I only have
BADHEADERS and MAILFROM set for hold and rest for warn. Are those the two
that most people have set to hold? Any way to make it so the spam
Hello Mark,
I use a weighted system. requires a lot more then badheaders to hold a
message. badheaders have a weight of 4. Need 15 to get held.
We use spamreview http://www.slsoft.com/spamreview.htm
to go through the held messages. In spam review we create filters that
delete what is obvious
Any way to make it so the spam forwards
to a specific email address so I can search it easier if a customer
complains that there message was marked spam?
No, but this is something that plan to add soon, as it is becoming more and
more frequently requested.
-Scott
Almost every webserver mail script trips badheaders so you will catch
a LOT of legit messages with that test alone. I advise against
holding messages that ONLY fails badheaders.
You're thinking of SPAMHEADERS (legal, but spamlike, headers not seen
coming from legitimate mail clients). Lots of
