RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Enhancement

2003-02-03 Thread John Tolmachoff
I also have a Hijack request. When Hijack is triggered on hold 2, often times it is some one inside sending out a broadcast. After talking to that person and explaining what happened, I need to allow that IP through again. Currently, the only why to do this is to stop (close) the console window.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Enhancement

2003-02-03 Thread R. Scott Perry
It would be nice if there was a way to reset a held IP remotely to allow it through. That is a good idea. However, if your remote access program can't access the Declude Hijack console, it's going to be hard to come up with a way to reset the IPs.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Enhancement

2003-02-03 Thread John Tolmachoff
However, if your remote access program can't access the Declude Hijack console, it's going to be hard to come up with a way to reset the IPs. I know you are waiting in anticipation for me to say it, so I will: MS Terminal services. I was thinking something along the lines of a command prompt

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Enhancement

2003-02-03 Thread Charles Frolick
AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Enhancement It would be nice if there was a way to reset a held IP remotely to allow it through. That is a good idea. However, if your remote access program can't access the Declude Hijack console, it's going to be hard to come up

[Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Enhancement

2003-02-02 Thread George Kulman
Scott, I find that HiJack catches a meaningful amount of SPAM for the store and forward domains and probably also helps out on Dictionary Attacks as well. It seems like some spammers deliberately target secondary MX's with the thought that they can sneak stuff through more easily. It appears

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Enhancement

2003-02-02 Thread George Kulman
Thanks again Scott. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 9:28 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Enhancement I find that HiJack catches a meaningful amount of SPAM