RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Interim Log Level Low and IP

2004-01-26 Thread Markus Gufler
be you can leave out from MID something like "This E-mail was routed in a poor manner consistent with spam" and "Message failed [TESTNAME]" By doing this the logfile size can be reduced by 15 to 20% without loosing any information.   Markus     From: [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Interim Log Level Low and IP

2004-01-26 Thread Matt
Let me ask people: do you think that it would be better to have the "Msg failed" lines in LOGLEVEL MID?  It would be nice to have a log level that was useful for most log analysis and not overly bloated for other reasons.  In fact, it would be nice to have  LOGLEVEL MID do a bit more trim

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Interim Log Level Low and IP

2004-01-26 Thread System Administrator
on 1/26/04 8:06 AM, R. Scott Perry wrote: > Let me ask people: do you think that it would be better to have the "Msg > failed" lines in LOGLEVEL MID? Yes (or add a midh level that is mid + "msg failed" lines). Greg --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.co

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Interim Log Level Low and IP

2004-01-26 Thread R. Scott Perry
And if you need to see the "Msg failed" lines and had loglevel mid in the beta or last released version of Declude you'll need to change to loglevel high to see those lines now. Correct. Nothing like having logs 5 times larger just to see the information that was in the old mid logs. Although LOG

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Interim Log Level Low and IP

2004-01-26 Thread Darin Cox
: "System Administrator" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, January 26, 2004 7:21 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Interim Log Level Low and IP on 1/23/04 6:54 PM, R. Scott Perry wrote: > Actually, with the latest interim release, if you use LOGLEVEL

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Interim Log Level Low and IP

2004-01-26 Thread System Administrator
on 1/23/04 6:54 PM, R. Scott Perry wrote: > Actually, with the latest interim release, if you use LOGLEVEL MID, you'll > get the IP without all those "Msg failed" lines. And if you need to see the "Msg failed" lines and had loglevel mid in the beta or last released version of Declude you'll need

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Interim Log Level Low and IP

2004-01-23 Thread Matt
I'll give that a try tonight. This might be a very nice happy medium. Thanks, Matt R. Scott Perry wrote: This is a feature request concerning the new/interim format of Log Level Low. It would be nice to have the IP logged at this level, and the need for this would otherwise cause me to ha

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Interim Log Level Low and IP

2004-01-23 Thread R. Scott Perry
This is a feature request concerning the new/interim format of Log Level Low. It would be nice to have the IP logged at this level, and the need for this would otherwise cause me to have to go to a higher log level currently, but I much prefer working with the much smaller files (almost 1/10t

[Declude.JunkMail] Interim Log Level Low and IP

2004-01-23 Thread Matt
Scott, This is a feature request concerning the new/interim format of Log Level Low. It would be nice to have the IP logged at this level, and the need for this would otherwise cause me to have to go to a higher log level currently, but I much prefer working with the much smaller files (almost