[Declude.JunkMail] Non-existent mail addresses

2003-08-02 Thread interactiveaustria
Hi, I realize that a lot of e-mail goes to the spam folder that is addressed to non-existent (or not-anymore-existent) addresses. Is there any reason, why Declude does not check the recipient's name before doing other tests? Wouldn't it be better to return e-mail to non exiistent addresses

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Non-existent mail addresses

2003-08-02 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
I realize that a lot of e-mail goes to the spam folder that is addressed to non-existent (or not-anymore-existent) addresses. Is there any reason, why Declude does not check the recipient's name before doing other tests? Wouldn't it be better to return e-mail to non exiistent addresses instead

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Non-existent mail addresses

2003-08-02 Thread Bill Landry
if you do not want to receive e-mails for these non-existent accounts. Bill - Original Message - From: interactiveaustria [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 11:06 PM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Non-existent mail addresses Hi, I realize that a lot of e

AW: [Declude.JunkMail] Non-existent mail addresses

2003-08-02 Thread interactiveaustria
of returning it. Is this by design? Michael -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Auftrag von Bill Landry Gesendet: Samstag, 02. August 2003 09:11 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Non-existent mail addresses Actually

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Non-existent mail addresses

2003-08-02 Thread R. Scott Perry
I don't have a nobody alias set up. If you don't have a nobody alias set up, IMail will reject E-mail to non-existent accounts, so the E-mail shouldn't be delivered. However: It seems to me that Declude takes the incoming mail and does the tests (spam, virus) before putting it into the inbox.