On 4 Nov 2004 at 16:01, Colbeck, Andrew wrote:
Hi Andrew -
An Off Topic thread ...
On various domains I administer, a single point of failure mailhost
has been good enough, but I'm shortly going to add a second host on a
second network for redundancy.
If you are looking for a location or
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick
Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 8:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: expanding beyond one mailhost
On 4 Nov 2004 at 16:01, Colbeck, Andrew wrote:
Hi Andrew -
An Off Topic thread ...
On various domains I
Thanks, everyone.
I was hoping for more war stories, or specific gotchas with more ornate
configurations, so I'm suprised at the few responses. For example, I've
noted that IMail has a queuing problem with HotMail advertising MX servers
that don't actually accept mail, or that don't exist, which
Colbeck, Andrew wrote:
Thanks, everyone.
I was hoping for more war stories, or specific gotchas with more ornate
configurations, so I'm suprised at the few responses. For example, I've
noted that IMail has a queuing problem with HotMail advertising MX servers
that don't actually accept mail, or
: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: expanding beyond one mailhost
Colbeck, Andrew wrote:
Thanks, everyone.
I was hoping for more war stories, or specific gotchas with more ornate
configurations, so I'm suprised at the few responses. For example,
I've noted that IMail has a queuing problem with HotMail advertising MX
An Off Topic thread ...
On various domains I administer, a single point of failure mailhost has been
good enough, but I'm shortly going to add a second host on a second network
for redundancy.
Now, I understand *how* to do that, but what I would like to hear from those
who've been there before
On Thursday, November 4, 2004, 7:01:22 PM, Andrew wrote:
CA An Off Topic thread ...
snip/
CA For example I could keep my single MX record and have round robin on the A
CA records. Or I could make a separate MX record and A record for each
CA mailhost, or do a classic MX = 10 and MX = 20 with a
- Original Message -
From: Colbeck, Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On various domains I administer, a single point of failure mailhost has
been
good enough, but I'm shortly going to add a second host on a second
network
for redundancy.
Now, I understand *how* to do that, but what I would
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Colbeck, Andrew
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 7:01 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: expanding beyond one mailhost
An Off Topic thread ...
On various domains I administer, a single point
Hi Mark,
Andrew,
We have 3 equal MX records and 3 A records for load balancing and
redundancy.
We also have a 4th MX which is physically off-site that's a lower
preference
level.
I put load-balancing in quotes because we still see our number 1 server
take
the brunt of the load.
Yup, a
10 matches
Mail list logo
