Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMHEADERS question - more confusion

2006-04-05 Thread Dan
PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMHEADERS question - more confusion David, Pardon the delayed reply, but I'm curious, how many possible codes are there and is there a comprehensive inventory or list anywhere? Thanks, Dan On Feb 24, 2006, at 5

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMHEADERS question - more confusion

2006-04-05 Thread Matt
eclude.com/tools/header.php David B www.declude.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Orin Wells Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 3:05 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMHEADERS question - more confusio

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMHEADERS question - more confusion

2006-04-05 Thread Dan
lf Of Dan Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 8:40 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMHEADERS question - more confusion David, Pardon the delayed reply, but I'm curious, how many possible codes are there and is there a comprehensive inventory or list anywher

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMHEADERS question - more confusion

2006-04-05 Thread David Barker
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 8:40 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMHEADERS question - more confusion David, Pardon the delayed reply, but I'm curious, how many possible codes are there and is th

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMHEADERS question - more confusion

2006-04-05 Thread Dean Lawrence
D]>To: <Declude.JunkMail@declude.com>Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 7:40 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMHEADERS question - more confusion> David,>> Pardon the delayed reply, but I'm curious, how many possible codes  are> there and is there a comprehensive invento

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMHEADERS question - more confusion

2006-04-04 Thread Scott Fisher
I doubt you'll get a list. I imagine this is proprietary information for Declude. - Original Message - From: "Dan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 7:40 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMHEADERS question - more confusion David, Par

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMHEADERS question - more confusion

2006-04-04 Thread Scott Fisher
I doubt yo - Original Message - From: "Dan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 7:40 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMHEADERS question - more confusion David, Pardon the delayed reply, but I'm curious, how many possible codes are

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMHEADERS question - more confusion

2006-04-04 Thread Scott Fisher
I doubty - Original Message - From: "Dan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 7:40 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMHEADERS question - more confusion David, Pardon the delayed reply, but I'm curious, how many possible codes are

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMHEADERS question - more confusion

2006-04-04 Thread Dan
vid B www.declude.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Orin Wells Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 3:05 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMHEADERS question - more confusion Thanks Matt. I don'

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMHEADERS question - more confusion

2006-02-24 Thread David Barker
: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMHEADERS question - more confusion Thanks Matt. I don't spend as much time as some of you folks have spent on both iMail and Declude so there is more than a little bit I still have to learn. I misread your first response and got off on the wrong track by thinking you had

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMHEADERS question - more confusion

2006-02-24 Thread Orin Wells
Thanks Matt.  I don't spend as much time as some of you folks have spent on both iMail and Declude so there is more than a little bit I still have to learn. I misread your first response and got off on the wrong track by thinking you had said the message-id header WAS inserted by the mail client.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMHEADERS question - more confusion

2006-02-23 Thread Matt
Outlook does not add a Message-ID header.  The difference between these two messages is that the first is one that is using your server as it's SMTP server and you are scanning the message as it came directly from the E-mail client, while the second example is one that passed through another se

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMHEADERS question - more confusion

2006-02-23 Thread Orin Wells
Clearly I am missing something here.  I am still wrestling with the SPAMHEADERS issue but with a different sender.  This time the sender is using Microsoft Office Outlook.  It appears messages coming from this sender do not have the Message-ID header.  But when I look at other messages sent by ot