vin Bilbee
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jonathan
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2005 2:16 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail Features (or lack thereof?)
Rats. I was hoping I was totally off-base, and all
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jonathan
> Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2005 2:16 PM
> To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
> Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail Features (or lack thereof?)
>
>
> Rats. I was hoping I was totally off-base, and all these features were
> actually hi
ehalf Of Jonathan
Sent: Jueves, 19 de Mayo de 2005 01:09 p.m.
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail Features (or lack thereof?)
So, we've been looking quite a bit at SmarterMail for the past few
months ... everyone in here seems to rant and rave about it, wi
t; [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonathan
> Sent: Jueves, 19 de Mayo de 2005 01:09 p.m.
> To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
> Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail Features (or lack thereof?)
>
> So, we've been looking quite a bit at SmarterMail for the past few
> months ... ev
At 01:08 PM 5/19/2005, you wrote:
So, we've been looking quite a bit at SmarterMail for the past few months
... everyone in here seems to rant and rave about it, wishing they had
switched sooner. However, when I really dig into it, it seems like it's
missing a lot of common functionality. Here's
So, we've been looking quite a bit at SmarterMail for the past few
months ... everyone in here seems to rant and rave about it, wishing
they had switched sooner. However, when I really dig into it, it seems
like it's missing a lot of common functionality. Here's a couple
examples that I confirm