RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Solution to "death of IMail"

2004-10-26 Thread Chuck Schick
For us this may be a blessing in disguise. I purchased a SA last Friday the 22nd and I am glad I did. Anyway as an ISP we have been thinking of changing our mail system anyway. Declude does need to look at a gateway type of product. We have been seriously looking into something like Barracuda

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Solution to death of iMail

2004-10-26 Thread Chase Seibert
nd Systems Engineer | Bullhorn Inc. | 617.464.2440 x119 | www.bullhorn.com -Original Message- From:decjunkmail [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ; Sent: Oct 26, 2004 04:21:43 AM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Solution to "death of IMail" Here's some &quo

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Solution to "death of IMail"

2004-10-26 Thread Rick Davidson
tober 26, 2004 4:46 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Solution to "death of IMail" What makes everyone think that Declude won't work with Ipswitch ICS? I'll bet that the core MTA in ICS is identical to Imail -- probably 99% of the same SMTP code. Unless the Spool folder, file n

RE: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Solution to "death of IMail"

2004-10-26 Thread Mark E. Smith
Markus, RE: > IPSwitch's strategy urges me to completely ignore this > product. They should see, that offending customers this way > is absolutely not acceptable. > First voices on the imail list are confirming my expectation > that ICS is neither comparable with Exchange. I agree 100% with you. I

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Solution to "death of IMail"

2004-10-26 Thread Jim
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 04:46:50 -0400, Mark E. Smith wrote: > What makes everyone think that Declude won't work with Ipswitch > ICS? I'll bet that the core MTA in ICS is identical to Imail -- > probably 99% of the same SMTP code. > Unless the Spool folder, file name structure and ability to call > you

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Solution to "death of IMail"

2004-10-26 Thread marc
scott, it is never too late and i think your are right with the 90% of your customers. marc At 13:09 26.10.2004, you wrote: [Replying to several posts here] Here's a thought - what about a Declude mail server? It sounds like a great idea, but it would also be a huge undertaking. By the tim

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Solution to "death of IMail"

2004-10-26 Thread R. Scott Perry
[Replying to several posts here] Here's a thought - what about a Declude mail server? It sounds like a great idea, but it would also be a huge undertaking. By the time we had something ready, it could be too late. What makes everyone think that Declude won't work with Ipswitch ICS? It almost cer

CBL:RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Solution to "death of IMail"

2004-10-26 Thread Markus Gufler
> What makes everyone think that Declude won't work with Ipswitch ICS? Nothing. I'm pretty sure that ICS has not very much new tecnology inside - it's only the package and the price that differ. > Has anyone downloaded a version and tested? > If I get a chance I'll DL and test in Virtual PC. I

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Solution to "death of IMail"

2004-10-26 Thread Mark E. Smith
ECTED] > Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Solution to "death of IMail" > > Here's some "food for thought" for Scott: > > Several on the list have suggested that Declude adapt to run > with other mail servers in addition to Imail. > > Of course, as Imail

[Declude.JunkMail] Solution to "death of IMail"

2004-10-26 Thread decjunkmail
Here's some "food for thought" for Scott: Several on the list have suggested that Declude adapt to run with other mail servers in addition to Imail. Of course, as Imail servers start getting replaced, it is very unlikely everyone will choose the same replacement MTA. More than likely, the Imai