RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview / HoldAnalyzer

2006-01-13 Thread Dave Beckstrom
: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview / HoldAnalyzer I have tested it but have never run it in a production environment. We plan to make the switch to SmarterMail once it supports whitelist auth with declude. If you would like to test it I will be more than willing to fix any bugs that you find

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview / HoldAnalyzer

2005-12-06 Thread Darin Cox
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview / HoldAnalyzer Hi Jay, SpamReview is what we use currently, but we're working on a replacement with a number of new features that we're intending to release at the end of the year. I'll post to this list as soon as it's

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview / HoldAnalyzer

2005-12-06 Thread Darin Cox
Hi Kevin, Didn't realize you had one. Is it available publicly? Darin. - Original Message - From: Kevin Bilbee [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 1:21 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview / HoldAnalyzer I have tested

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview / HoldAnalyzer

2005-12-06 Thread Kevin Bilbee
Steiner Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 10:03 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview / HoldAnalyzer Will your replacement also work with SmarterMail? I believe the only difference between IMail and SmarterMail in this case is how they name their files

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview / HoldAnalyzer

2005-12-06 Thread Kevin Bilbee
/ HoldAnalyzer Hi Kevin, Didn't realize you had one. Is it available publicly? Darin. - Original Message - From: Kevin Bilbee [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 1:21 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview

[Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview / HoldAnalyzer

2005-12-05 Thread Jay Sudowski - Handy Networks LLC
Hi All - I'm trying to find a utility that will let me analyze Declude's hold directory (well, sub-directories now) and ultimately deliver and held mail. From reviewing the archives, it looks like SpamReview and HoldAnalyzer are the two most frequently discussed programs, but I'm having issues

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview / HoldAnalyzer

2005-12-05 Thread Darin Cox
[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 10:10 PM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview / HoldAnalyzer Hi All - I'm trying to find a utility that will let me analyze Declude's hold directory (well, sub-directories now) and ultimately deliver and held

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview / HoldAnalyzer

2005-12-05 Thread Kevin Bilbee
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jay Sudowski - Handy Networks LLC Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 7:10 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview / HoldAnalyzer Hi All - I'm trying to find a utility that will let me analyze Declude's hold directory (well, sub

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview / HoldAnalyzer

2005-12-05 Thread Gary Steiner
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview / HoldAnalyzer Hi Jay, SpamReview is what we use currently, but we're working on a replacement with a number of new features that we're intending to release at the end of the year. I'll post to this list as soon as it's

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview / HoldAnalyzer

2005-12-05 Thread Kevin Bilbee
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary Steiner Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 10:03 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview / HoldAnalyzer Will your replacement also work with SmarterMail? I believe the only difference between