And we all know that there will not be posts regarding the suit from any of the
parties.
-d
- Original Message -
From: Darin Cox
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 4:28 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Re:Declude vs Perry (ES)
We all
We all know the second example is the timeline...
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Andy Schmidt
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 2:59 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Re:Declude vs Perry (ES)
Well, Darin - it may be relevant to look at the
ulbs, where
appropriate.
*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of
*Darin Cox
*Sent:* Tuesday, September 09, 2008 2:03 PM
*To:* declude.junkmail@declude.com
*Subject:* Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Re:Declude vs Perry (ES)
Did he keep a copy of the code, or did he just
Perhaps suing your partners is a Rich Person(tm) idea of good Corporate
Stewardship(tm). It certainly is a far cry from supporting, promoting,
and improving the product line, you know, the normal way a company Earns
Money(tm).
Andrew.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hex-nuts and headlight bulbs, where appropriate.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin
Cox
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 2:03 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Re:Declude vs Perry (ES)
Did he keep a copy of the code, or did he just
Hi Craig,
Craig Edmonds wrote:
I am not a lawyer so dont understand 100%.
So Scott Perry agreed to sell the code but kept a copy anyway and when
the new owners of Declude went to raise capital they found out that
Scott Perry had already developed an additional product with the code
they had
was central to the
purchase. However, the above two points still apply.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Craig Edmonds
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 1:42 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Re:Declude vs Perry (ES)
I am not a lawyer so dont
author.
Best Regards,
Andy Schmidt
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig
Edmonds
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 1:42 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Re:Declude vs Perry (ES)
I am not a lawyer so dont understand 100%.
From whats posted below I draw the same conclusion as you Craig.
Craig Edmonds wrote:
I am not a lawyer so dont understand 100%.
So Scott Perry agreed to sell the code but kept a copy anyway and when
the new owners of Declude went to raise capital they found out that
Scott Perry had already
I am not a lawyer so dont understand 100%.
So Scott Perry agreed to sell the code but kept a copy anyway and when the
new owners of Declude went to raise capital they found out that Scott Perry
had already developed an additional product with the code they had bought.
I dont see the problem mysel
It is version 4.4.0:
Declude 4.4.0 Diagnostics-Original Message-From: "David Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Sent 9/5/2008 2:25:22 PMTo: declude.junkmail@declude.comSubject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] decludeproc.exe crashing - v. 4.4.0
What version of Decludeproc are you runn
What version of Decludeproc are you running ? Check your declude\diags.txt
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kathy Leonard
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 1:31 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] decludeproc.exe crashing - v. 4.4.0
d
If your Declude\diags.txt indeed shows 4.4.0 log into your declude account and
you will find the log in for the interim releases. There is a 4.4.18 release
that deals with some Imail address book issues that can be causing the crashes.
If you need further help please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of
Serge
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 9:12 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF Issue
Seems all is OK
thank you al for your help
Serge
- Original Message -
From: "Andy Schmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, Se
Seems all is OK
thank you al for your help
Serge
- Original Message -
From: "Andy Schmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 2:46 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF Issue
I checked your 4 DNS servers. dns2 is down, but the other 3 all ret
nized
AND handled correctly by third party servers.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Serge
Sent: Monday, September 01, 2008 7:16 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF Issue
Here is what i get from DNSSTUFF
Not
hmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, September 01, 2008 12:41 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF Issue
What is the issue? What error message? Was it bounced mail? What did the
NDR
say? I could be a recipient trying to forward mail to another server, or
an
end-user trying to
What is the issue? What error message? Was it bounced mail? What did the NDR
say? I could be a recipient trying to forward mail to another server, or an
end-user trying to send email from home using their local ISP... etc.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
> I have som SPF issues
What issues?
Did you validate your TXT record at openspf?
--Sandy
Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist
Broadleaf Systems, a division of
Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc.
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SpamAssassin plugs into Declude!
ht
at the
end of the domain name to also be pasted because if you do, Alligate
will ignore it.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Craig Edmonds
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2008 7:53 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkM
Who isn't?
Yes, we've been running Imail 10 from the start, now 10.01 and are using it
with Declude 4.4.16.
Best Regards,
Andy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin
Moose
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2008 12:24 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@decl
7:53 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Alligate Problems (ES)
Yeah. Glad to hear that it all works for you.
ALWAYS copy and paste domain names and email addresses!!!
Kindest Regards
Craig Edmonds
123 Marbella Internet Services
W: www.123marbell
Sent: 29 August 2008 16:03
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Alligate Problems
Thanks everyone for your input. It looks like my install is now working as
it should be.
The slow delivery times was caused by performance problems on a remote mail
server and a
Thanks everyone for your input. It looks like my install is now working as
it should be.
The slow delivery times was caused by performance problems on a remote mail
server and a MX record that should have been reconfigured. The simple story
was that 5+ years ago I was running backup smtp serv
Ruskview Road
Kitchener, ON, N2M 4S1
519-741-1222
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig
Edmonds
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 9:28 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Re: Alligate Problems (ES)
Dang. Thats good Harry.
Kind of
August 2008 15:23
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Re: Alligate Problems
Alligate and Imail have different IPs on the same machine.
In my setup all MX records point to the Alligate IP of x.x.x.22
Alligate then forwards the mail to Imail at x.x.x.12.
You
ers end
Thanks very much
Ferrell Ard
- Original Message -
From: "Harry vanderzand" < <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: < <mailto:declude.junkmail@declude.com> declude.junkmail@declude.com>
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 9:32 PM
Subject: RE:
have to change :
(1) in DNS
(2) at the Customers end
Thanks very much
Ferrell Ard
- Original Message -
From: "Harry vanderzand" < <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: < <mailto:declude.junkmail@declude.com> declude.junkmail@declude.com
Scott,
I run Alligate as well, in front of my Imail server. Took it from 100% CPU
all day to averaging 20%. It works really well for me, and I am delivering
to several different domains including districts (GroupWise). Have you
tweaked with any of the settings or are you simply running it out of
Hi Scott,
Scott Fosseen wrote:
I guess I am looking for a word of encouragement from the alligate
supporters out there that I should stay diligent or if there are any tips
you can share.
Alligate is unbelievable with what it does and with what little resource
it uses. It is the way to go - be
debe usar, difundir, copiar
de ninguna forma, ni emprender ninguna accion en relacion con ella.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harry
vanderzand
Sent: 26 August 2008 03:32
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT
I love Alligate.
We have never had any problems with it and it takes care of over 80% of the
spam at the front end.
We run it on the same box as my imail software and when we implemented it
the server went from an average of 90% utilization to around 50%.
I find it well worth it
Harry Vanderzan
From: "Ferrell Ard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 8:44 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Question about Declude
We have Declude AVG (sure hope I have it configured
correctly).
.
Ferrell
- Original Message -
From: John Doyle
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 4:05 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Question about Declude
Are you running the Declude AVG or other virus scanner and you are getting
leakage?
Or do you not have
Are you running the Declude AVG or other virus scanner and you are
getting leakage?
Or do you not have any anti-virus running?
John
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Ferrell Ard
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 11:06 AM
To: declude.junkm
Which virus scanner/s are you running ?
David Barker
VP Operations Declude
Your Email security is our business
978.499.2933 x 7007 office
978.988.1311 fax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-declude -dnsstuff
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ferrell
Ard
Sent: Tuesday
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Todd
Richards
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 10:55 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelist auth and spammer infested computer
Harry -
When I upgraded a few years ago to the Declude "suite", it came with it and
w
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Todd
Richards
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 10:55 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelist auth and spammer infested computer
Harry -
When I upgraded a few years ago to the Declude "suite", it came w
upgraded too!)
So the first thing I guess you should do is make sure you actually have
HiJack?
Todd
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harry
vanderzand
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 7:24 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] w
4S1
519-741-1222
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Todd
Richards
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2008 10:01 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelist auth and spammer infested computer
Hi Harry -
HiJack will do what you need to
In this regard, I would like to see an alternative to "Whitelist Auth". Create
a test for Authentication. That way we can add a negative weight rather than
whitelist an email.
Just a thought,
Don
- Original Message -
From: Harry vanderzand
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
S
Hi Harry -
HiJack will do what you need to here. I have two client's who send out mass
emails (about 1000-1500) and HiJack stops it every time (it even stopped me
once!). I have a script to check the "hold" directory for messages, and
when I am alerted I simply go in and see whether or not th
Thanks for the quick reaction (and for the update).
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
Barker
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2008 11:29 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] all_list.dat
Sensitivity: Personal
New all_list.dat
New all_list.dat available at the My Account page of Declude.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
Barker
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2008 10:19 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] all_list.dat
Sensitivity: Personal
Andy
Andy,
There will be an updated all_list.dat posted later today.
David Barker
VP Operations Declude
Your Email security is our business
978.499.2933 x 7007 office
978.988.1311 fax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy
Schmidt
Sent: Th
D] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell ([EMAIL
PROTECTED])
Sent: Saturday, August 02, 2008 5:17 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude Crashing
Do you have autoreview enabled? If so when Declude crashes on restart
it will copy the files (work dir) bac
MAIL
PROTECTED])
Sent: Saturday, August 02, 2008 5:17 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude Crashing
Do you have autoreview enabled? If so when Declude crashes on restart
it will copy the files (work dir) back into the proc for processing.
These types of c
Do you have autoreview enabled? If so when Declude crashes on restart
it will copy the files (work dir) back into the proc for processing.
These types of crashes are most likely assuming no changes to your
system a result of a bad message.
If you disable autoreview and the crashes stop you c
Mark,
Sounds like a 'killer message'. It would help to post the contents of
the HDR file associated with that log line as Declude may be dying on
parsing a value in that HDR file.
I've noted more common crashes of DecludeProc recently myself, but we
are behind an Alligate gateway so much of
What I understand from David Franco the developer who implemented the PCRE
he had indicated that PCRE was exponentially faster than the standard
filters. Although I don't have any measurements I would suggest PCRE as
being faster and far more efficient.
David B
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto
ue as
you can see in the link for the deployment notes.
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T
Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2008 12:01 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DKIM
Having WHITELIST AUTH on will not stop externals
Having WHITELIST AUTH on will not stop externals from running UNLESS you also
have PREWHITELIST on.John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: "Gufler Markus | Limitis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent 7/15/2008 12:11:31 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] DKIMHi
s" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 4:26 PM
> Subject: X-IMail-SPAM RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Overnight Spam Increase?
>
>
> > OK, that was it. I went onto my mail server and tried to ping my DNS
> > server. No go. I rebooted my DNS serv
vid
Barker
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 2:01 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Overnight Spam Increase?
ISSUE:
Spam is slipping past Declude that hasn't normally passed any filtering.
Spam is not being weighted high enough for actionable thresholds to tak
use the following.
DNS 208.67.222.222
Also check your firewall to make sure it is not blocking DNS queries.
David B
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Todd
Richards
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 11:05 AM
To: declude.junkmail@decl
rsday, July 10, 2008 9:11 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Overnight Spam Increase?
Looks like you are having a DNS problem, this email never scored any RBL's
yet when checking the IP it failed several.
Failed: SPAMCOP HOSTKARMA SENDERSCORE UBL UCEPROTECTL2 UC
ECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Todd
Richards
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 9:16 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Overnight Spam Increase?
Thanks David. What I'm seeing is legitimate spam that while it is going
through Declude - most is marked as s
sident.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
Barker
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 2:24 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Overnight Spam Increase?
We got slammed at about 9 am EST time
We got slammed at about 9 am EST time today, causing delays, most of the
increase looks like backscatter.
David B
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Todd
Richards
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 11:47 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subjec
Title: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] can't deinstall 3.1.0
Hallo Matt, that would clarify
that I have seen hundred of eMails saying: "eMail removed, the reason might be virus scan" or "The message you are looking for does not exist."
messages.
Thanks for hinting this.
Uwe
2008 2:40 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] can't deinstall 3.1.0
Uwe,
I think the install has been broken for a couple of years. It always
seems to drop the files in the wrong directories. I have found myself
having to go into the registry to fix things
Hi David, thank you for your prompt help !
We did an uninstall +fresh install via command line.
Now the 4.4.0 version runs fine. :-)
Uwe
===8<=== Original Nachrichtentext ===
Hello Matt, thank you. :-)
I did that already yesterday.
I deleted almost every phrase in
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] can't deinstall 3.1.0
Uwe,
I think the install has been broken for a couple of years. It always
seems to drop the files in the wrong directories. I have found myself
having to go into the registry to fix things every t
Hello Matt, thank you. :-)
I did that already yesterday.
I deleted almost every phrase in the registry containing Declude,
rebooted the machine. But it didn't help.
Where exactly are the services defined ?
Is there any step-by-step instruction on how
to do it ?
Uwe
> Uwe,
> I think the install ha
Uwe,
I think the install has been broken for a couple of years. It always
seems to drop the files in the wrong directories. I have found myself
having to go into the registry to fix things every time I install it.
If you look in the registry for where the services are defined, you
should b
TECTED] On Behalf Of Ferrell
Ard
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 8:09 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] blocking certain character sets - koi8
Importance: Low
David
I finally got another "koi8" that my character-filter missed.
My character filter is
|
dqbiz.net
X-RCPT-TO: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Status:
X-UIDL: 499838735
X-IMail-ThreadID: 6c7901831908
- Original Message -
From: David Barker
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 8:39 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.Junk
Anymore??? When were they "trusted"?
People that run a blacklist without a financial incentive generally are
agressive individuals that have lost their will for tollerance, and
don't want to be bothered by things like false positives. Those with
easy to maintain systems (primarily automated
When you have a chance, call me.
I didn't put the 14 yet.
Stephan
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de David
Barker
Envoyé : 19 juin, 2008 15:23
À : declude.junkmail@declude.com
Objet : RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Interim Release 4
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don
Kuhwarth
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 2:54 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Interim Release 4.4.12
I installed the 4.4.12 version when it was released and it has fixed
the TXT file orphans left in the WORK directory. But twice
I installed the 4.4.12 version when it was released and it has fixed
the TXT file orphans left in the WORK directory. But twice since
then, the decludeproc service has stopped functioning, and mail has
built up in the proc directory until I stop and start the service. It
just stopped again no
Hi Kathy,
Here is what I posted a week ago. Works for us...with no excessive CPU load.
However, it sounds like your problems are a deeper configuration issue since
you mention multiple scanners allowing viruses through.
Assuming the default locati
Scott,
Here are my thoughts..
> My question is... Is/Has anyone else tried this approach If so is
> impact on the amount of mail your server had to process?
Yes, I have taken this approach for the absolute worst offenders.
Mostly the most abusive senders. This however has very limited impa
http://www.pcre.org/pcre.txt
http://www.tote-taste.de/X-Project/regex/syntax.html
I would suggest this tool http://www.regexbuddy.com/ makes it very easy to
learn.
David B
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 6:13 PM
To: dec
: 29 May 2008 17:23
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Mail Pre-Processor recommendations
Nick Hayer said:
> I have a small utility that will allow Declude (for
> Imail) to run on an Alligate box without Imail being present.
... and it works. I'm using Nic
lf Of Nick
Hayer
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 6:15 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Mail Pre-Processor recommendations
Colbeck, Andrew wrote:
> I use Alligate from Solid Oak Software, and I like it a lot.
as do I.
The really slick part is how it r
Colbeck, Andrew wrote:
I use Alligate from Solid Oak Software, and I like it a lot.
as do I.
The really slick part is how it reduces bandwidth - it *very* accurately
distinguishes spam etal before the DATA command thereby preventing the
unwanted emails from ever being received..
Shameles
je, por la presente se le comunica que no debe usar, difundir, copiar
de ninguna forma, ni emprender ninguna accion en relacion con ella.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: 28 May 2008 23:32
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail
: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Mail Pre-Processor recommendations
I concur with Andrew, Alligate saved our company a ton of money in upgrades
to our mail server. Our mail server CPU's were peaked 24x7. When I
inserted Alligate into the mix, CPU's peak at about
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colbeck,
Andrew
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 1:52 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Mail Pre-Processor recommendations
I use Alligate from Solid Oak Software, and I like it a lot.
On my primary gateway, I received j
Scott,
Alligate is a good gateway to use when you have something like Declude
behind it.
The only reason that I can think of that your Barracuda box is seeing
that many messages would be because you might not be validating
addresses. Like Andrew said, you can cut your _connection_ traffic b
I use Alligate from Solid Oak Software, and I like it a lot.
On my primary gateway, I received just shy of 500,000 connections in the
last 24 hours, and my Declude only had to see 4% of that traffic. Yes,
4%.
I'm spending less time doing clever things in Declude, because Alligate
is pre-filtering
Thanks David.John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: "David Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent 5/23/2008 8:22:11 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] PCRE check(?i:allen.{0,6}\.info) All
expressions must be in parenthesis ?i: no
(?i:allen.{0,6}\.info)
All expressions must be in parenthesis
?i:non case sensitive
.* any character
{0,6} minimum 0 characters to a maximum of 6
\. Because . can mean any character a \. means specifically use .
Hope this helps.
David B
From: [EMAIL PROTECTE
Hi John,
Keep us posted how you get on because I have no idea about regular expressions
and would like to see how you trun out.
:o)
Kindest Regards
Craig Edmonds
123 Marbella Internet
W: www.123marbella.net
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T
Sent: 23
Are you referring to the ROUTING test? Or do you want to fail versus a
specific path?
Original Message
> From: David Dodell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2008 9:51 AM
> To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
> Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Country Routing Test?
>
> I
I prefer
table...
tennis
- Original Message -
From: John T
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2008 12:44 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Tip of the day??
Pong
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: "De
PongJohn T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: "Declude Junkmail" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent 5/14/2008 12:12:45 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Tip of the day??Ping. kinda quiet arounf
here... Anyone got any tips on blocking the business loan junkma
Oh, well, thanks anyway Dave. I have 4.2.20 and no current SA.
- Original Message -
From: David Barker
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 10:00 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] blocking certain character sets
Declude Security Suite 4.3.40 [12
Declude Security Suite 4.3.40 [12 March 2007]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Imail
Admin
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 12:45 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] blocking certain character sets
David,
Can you tell me when
David,
Can you tell me when (what version number) the PCRE filter was introduced?
Thanks,
Ben
- Original Message -
From: David Barker
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 8:39 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] blocking certain character sets
@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] blocking certain character sets
When I added to my global.cfg
BANCHARSETkoi8-r
it did not do anything ( emails continued to come in with this character
set)
Putting it into a Filter DID work.
ANYWHERE 30 PCRE (?i:(charset=.{0,2}koi8-[ur
t find a manual for my version either).
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ben
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "David Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 8:14 AM
> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] blocking certain character sets
>
>
>
OTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 8:14 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] blocking certain character sets
For these char sets it is much easier - use the following:
ANYWHERE 10 PCRE (?i:(iso-2022-jp|unicode-1-1-utf-7))
David B
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Beha
Message -
From: David Barker
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 10:21 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] blocking certain character sets
I am surprised that they are still coming through, I would think that should
have stopped it altogether. However add the f
nkmail@declude.com
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 10:21 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] blocking certain character sets
I am surprised that they are still coming through, I would think that should
have stopped it altogether. However add the following line to a junkmail filter:
Ruben,
One thing you can do is create a from filter that looks for the null
sender and than do a copyfile action on it if it did not match the
backscatter filter. This way you will be able to see which messages did
not get filtered to improve the back scatter filter for your system.
Darrell
I would first find out if the base64 encoding arrived in tact...this is a
link to a base64 decoder..
http://www.opinionatedgeek.com/dotnet/tools/Base64Decode/
Just copy and paste the message into the window, and if it has arrived
correctly, it should be readable. If it is readable, then there is
END CONTAINSX-AUTH: Yes
David Barker
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dean
Lawrence
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 5:46 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMMERS using "postmaster@"
Dave,
Is there a way to specify a range of IPs in the backscatter filter? My
server has about 50 IPs and it would be nice not to have to enter all
of them. 8- )
Thanks,
Dean
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 1:06 PM, David Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> FILTER-NOSENDER is used to see if it is an
801 - 900 of 25088 matches
Mail list logo
