RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ASSP

2006-09-20 Thread David Barker
nue to use Declude as they always have. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 5:27 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ASSP T

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ASSP

2006-09-19 Thread Jay Sudowski - Handy Networks LLC
: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ASSP To the best of my knowledge Declude Interceptor is really no different than the regular version of Declude packaged into a gateway. The real benefit of Interceptor is that you are no longer coupled to Imail/Smartermail in the gateway environment. From my testing

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ASSP

2006-09-19 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
To the best of my knowledge Declude Interceptor is really no different than the regular version of Declude packaged into a gateway. The real benefit of Interceptor is that you are no longer coupled to Imail/Smartermail in the gateway environment. From my testing you had all of the same files

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ASSP

2006-09-19 Thread xx-xx- --x--x
Maybe you should run your assp gateway against the Declude interceptorOn 9/19/06, Harry Vanderzand <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:I am interested in this also.  Maybe it can be on list?Harry Vanderzand inTown Internet & Computer Services519-741-1222> -Original Message-> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ASSP

2006-09-19 Thread Harry Vanderzand
I am interested in this also. Maybe it can be on list? Harry Vanderzand inTown Internet & Computer Services 519-741-1222 > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Don Brown > Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 3:03 PM > To: declude.junk