Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Blacklist effectiveness

2005-06-03 Thread Darin Cox
Message - From: "Dave Marchette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 11:48 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Blacklist effectiveness Darin, If you have not yet, you might consider adding SURBL testing as well. Darrell (http://www.invariantsystems.com) has a p

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Blacklist effectiveness

2005-06-03 Thread Dave Marchette
est domain, that we were utilizing SURBL. Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Scott Fisher Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 7:11 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Blacklist effectiveness I&#

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Blacklist effectiveness

2005-06-03 Thread Scott Fisher
I post my spam test effectiveness's from Feb 2004 forward at: - Original Message - From: Darin Cox To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 8:33 AM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Blacklist effectiveness Anyone else noticing over the past few

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Blacklist effectiveness

2005-06-03 Thread Scott Fisher
I've posted my spamtest effectiveness from Feb 2004 forward at http://it.farmprogress.com/declude/declude.htm   - Original Message - From: Darin Cox To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 8:33 AM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Blacklist effectiv

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Blacklist effectiveness

2005-06-03 Thread Sharyn Schmidt
Title: Message Anyone else noticing over the past few months that DNSBLs and RHSBLs have almost completely lost their effectiveness?    Hmmm   I just finally bit the bullet the other day and upgraded to 2.0.6 from 1.82.   I used my old cfg file but copied over all the newest tests including