RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test

2005-04-12 Thread David Barker
Any feedback on these tests and performance will be appreciated here is some info on these tests. BCC bcc 10 x 5 0 This test type, checks to see if there are more than X known BCC:'s for this E-mail (where X is the first test-type-specific piece of information set to 10

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test

2005-04-12 Thread Nick
On 12 Apr 2005 at 13:16, David Barker wrote: Hi David, BCC bcc 10 x 5 0 This test type, checks to see if there are more than X known BCC:'s I think Darrell's question was related to optimum setting rather than functionality. -Nick --- This E-mail came from the

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test

2005-04-12 Thread Kami Razvan
Darrell.. The BCC test to me is scary if used by itself- I can see it being used as a combo test but alone with any weight is not something I would use. We have clients that use their outlook and send 50+ people in a single BCC .. Emails to boards and volunteer groups in nonprofits and

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test

2005-04-12 Thread David Barker
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test On 12 Apr 2005 at 13:16, David Barker wrote: Hi David, BCC bcc 10 x 5 0 This test type, checks to see if there are more than X known BCC:'s I think Darrell's question was related to optimum setting rather than

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test

2005-04-12 Thread Kami Razvan
: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 2:07 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test Kami, Excellent point - what would you combo this with? Darrell Kami Razvan writes: Darrell.. The BCC test to me is scary if used by itself- I can see it being used

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test

2005-04-12 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
at your organization. Andrew 8) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kami Razvan Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 11:21 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test Hi Darrell: I have a number tests like

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test

2005-04-12 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test Any feedback on these tests and performance will be appreciated here is some info on these tests. BCC bcc 10 x 5 0 This test type, checks to see if there are more than X known BCC:'s for this E-mail (where X is the first test-type-specific piece

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test

2005-04-12 Thread Scott Fisher
- From: Kami Razvan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 12:33 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test Darrell.. The BCC test to me is scary if used by itself- I can see it being used as a combo test but alone with any weight is not something I

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test

2005-04-12 Thread Nick
On 12 Apr 2005 at 11:38, Colbeck, Andrew wrote: I've found the new DYNHELO test to be quite useful and I've subsequently stopped using Bud's free external tool (HELOisIP from http://bud.thedurlands.com/ ). Thanks Andrew - [sorry Bud} I will follow your lead and do the same - -Nick ---

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test

2005-04-12 Thread Andy Schmidt
Hm - I looked at http://www.declude.com/Version/Manuals/2.0.6.asp - but don't find any DYNHELO? Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax:+1 201 934-9206 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell ([EMAIL

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test

2005-04-12 Thread Scott Fisher
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test Hm - I looked at http://www.declude.com/Version/Manuals/2.0.6.asp - but don't find any DYNHELO? Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax:+1 201 934-9206 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test

2005-04-12 Thread Andy Schmidt
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test I noted in in the global.cfg file for 2.06. I believe these tests to be new: DYNHELO dynhelo x x 7 0 ENCODEDURL encodedurl x x 1 0 IPURL ipurl x x 2 0 --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test

2005-04-12 Thread Kami Razvan
http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=151 Regards, - Kami -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 3:35 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test Hm - I looked

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test

2005-04-12 Thread Dan Horne
Why is IPURL listed as Currently N/A ? Not Applicable? To what? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kami Razvan Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 4:14 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test http

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test

2005-04-12 Thread Andy Schmidt
@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test Why is IPURL listed as Currently N/A ? Not Applicable? To what? --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test

2005-04-12 Thread Dan Horne
Is it available now? Is it working in 2.0.6? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 5:16 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test Probably meant not available

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test

2005-04-12 Thread David Barker
www.declude.com - Original Message - From: Colbeck, Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 5:50 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test From my own experimentation, I'd say that as of today in v2.0.6 DYNHELO is definitely working