It depends a few factors:
1. If you have the PRO version you have the ability to do outbound scanning
2. If you are using WHITELIST AUTH or Whitelisting your domains or
Whitelisting your IP anything originating from your domain will not be
stopped.
3. Declude can be configured to catch spam on
Jovanovic
The LAN Shoppe
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Doherty
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 9:53 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Forwarding and Hosting on IMail vs
, SmartHost is generating
about 100mb of log files a day..
-d
- Original Message -
From: Goran Jovanovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 11:49 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Forwarding and Hosting on IMail vs.
SmarterMail
Hi Dave,
When
:18 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Forwarding and Hosting on IMail vs.
SmarterMail
There are some things missing, but there are also a lot of
small neat features that make you say 'what a neat idea'...
Could you elaborate on what is missing and what
are deleted this way.
I like the management features, too.
-d
- Original Message -
From: Goran Jovanovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 8:23 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Forwarding and Hosting on IMail vs.
SmarterMail
Thank you all who
Goran, I have no experience with SmarterMail, but I would generally
suggest that doing your antispam content filtering on a box with which
your end users have direct experience is bad.
In other words, I would suggest always having a gateway configuration,
with your mailboxes on an internal
Goran Jovanovic wrote:
So my question is the following: Is there enough knowledge out there yet
that if I was to put everything back on one server but use SmarterMail
instead of IMail with the same Declude package would I be suffering the
same performance problems? I have heard more than once that
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 21:29:25 -0500, Matt wrote:
I'm watching intently myself for what other's experiences are with
SmarterMail, and I trust that Declude will work hard to iron out
the issues that exist in the migration to this new platform. I
We just moved to Smartermail. I did the migration
There are some things missing, but there are also a lot of
small neat features that make you say 'what a neat idea'...
Could you elaborate on what is missing and what is neat?
Kevin Bilbee
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail
I have seen from the list archives that when an account is forwarded to
another, the second account receives all spams, instead of them being
placed in the spam mailbox.
Correct -- that is by design. The forwarded E-mail may go to another
server that does not support mailboxes.
Is there a
Would marking the subject still allow the Imail rules to process on the
receiving end?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Monday, June 21, 2004 1:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Forwarding
Would marking the subject still allow the Imail rules to process on the
receiving end?
Marking the subject would still allow the E-mail to be forwarded (since it
reaches the recipient), and the marked subject would be intact so that the
new (forwarded to) recipient would be able to detect that
This is generally a bad idea because you might be blacklisting something
that others don't consider spam. I've seen experiments where someone
built a DNSBL blacklist from things scoring over a certain weight and
this had the effect of polluting the data with his local blacklisting
settings
You make a good point with a reverse of your the The best value to Sniffer would be
to promote the lowest scoring
things argument.
I too am worried about false positive which is why I would have been considering
sending stuff that is 40 points (which is 9 points higher than my highest false
I just stumbled onto this thread and I can't stay (work to do with sprint)...
For the record, I agree with everything Matt said here, though I might make
the point a little more softly. Automated spam submissions would probably
be ok as long as we knew it was coming and how it was being sourced
15 matches
Mail list logo
