>I figured I would express the way the spammers our making it difficult to
figure out who is the bad guy and who is the good guy.
Boy Tom, you're not kidding. I have one client that gets a lot of bcc
broadcasts because of the competitive nature of the business they are in. I
have to do a lot of wh
> I don't know what to say
> I'm sorry? I was just curious.
There is no reason to be sorry, I wrote the message to clarify
our fromfile and what we are about. I figured I would express
the way the spammers our making it difficult to figure out who
is the bad guy and who is the good guy.
>
am not trying to "start" anything - maybe just clarifying something.
Regards,
Patrick
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-owner@;declude.com]On Behalf Of Craig Gittens
> Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 9:17 AM
> To: [EMAI
ED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Fromfile Status 11/12/02- Image`fx
Importance: High
> Well I just wanted to see what the reason was. I assumed since
> all the entries have a catalogue number that the reason was
> recorded. In addition I do believe outpost does have removal
> instru
and it checks for duplicates.
-Don S.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:Declude.JunkMail-owner@;declude.com] On Behalf Of Tom
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 8:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Fromfile Status 11/12/02- Image`fx
Importance: High
> I am only human and un-like a computer I do make mistakes
> and unlike a computer I try to rectify them.
>
> I hope Spews is listening...
>
> Sorry i just could not resist...
LOL, I know what you mean. I was once listed on SpamCop.
Thank goodness they are reasonable and handle these things
b
> Well I just wanted to see what the reason was. I assumed since
> all the entries have a catalogue number that the reason was
> recorded. In addition I do believe outpost does have removal
> instructions at the bottom of the emails.
Our List:
Our list is a private list, however, we do share it
2 5:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Fromfile Status 11/12/02- Image`fx
> Any particular reason you are blocking o u t p o s t.com?
Although I am blocking it, does not mean you have to.
I don't remember every reason for each site added to
the list, however, more than
>> If you feel that for some reason I am wrong for placing them into the
list then I would like to here it. I am only human and un-like a computer I
do make mistakes and unlike a computer I try to rectify them.
I hope Spews is listening...
Sorry i just could not resist...
eddie :)
---
[This E-
> I wanted to thank you for your time and effort that you have put
> into posting and keeping up to date a file that I can use to help
guard
> against spam. I know how busy life and work can be and wanted to
thank
> you for your diligence in providing a service (free) to me as well as
> this f
>You know what is even more laughable is that I am the
>one who posted the list and it got caught by my own
>spam traps.
At least we all know it works. :))
John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA
IT Manager, Network Engineer
RelianceSoft, Inc.
Fullerton, CA 92835
www.reliancesoft.com
---
[This E-mail was s
> LOL
You know what is even more laughable is that I am the
one who posted the list and it got caught by my own
spam traps.
Regards,
Tom
Image`fx
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
> Any particular reason you are blocking o u t p o s t.com?
Although I am blocking it, does not mean you have to.
I don't remember every reason for each site added to
the list, however, more than likely they were sending
us junk mail without permission. If you feel that for
some reason I am wron
> I wanted to thank you for your time and effort that you have put
> into posting and keeping up to date a file that I can use to help guard
> against spam. I know how busy life and work can be and wanted to thank
> you for your diligence in providing a service (free) to me as well as
> thi
>> @boing.azoogle.com
> curious, but would having .azoogle be better than boing.azoogle? if they
> change boing to boing2 the mail would get through correct?
I also have .azoogle.com listed. This will catch almost anything from them
except for @azoogle.com - Using both these methods will allo
PROTECTED]
[mailto:Declude.JunkMail-owner@;declude.com] On Behalf Of Dan Spangenberg
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 10:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Fromfile Status 11/12/02- Image`fx
Are the messages from this particular thread getting caught by sniffer for
ail-owner@;declude.com]On Behalf Of Keith Johnson
> Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 10:08 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Fromfile Status 11/12/02- Image`fx
>
>
> Tom,
> I wanted to thank you for your time and effort that you have put
> into post
Tom,
I wanted to thank you for your time and effort that you have put
into posting and keeping up to date a file that I can use to help guard
against spam. I know how busy life and work can be and wanted to thank
you for your diligence in providing a service (free) to me as well as
this fo
> found: 26 ID-20021112-000700 @boing.azoogle.com
curious, but would having .azoogle be better than boing.azoogle? if they
change boing to boing2 the mail would get through correct?
That's the problem I have on deciding this stuff, if you say .azoogle alone,
ANYTHING from azoogle will be b
19 matches
Mail list logo
