RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Something better than Declude

2002-11-13 Thread Tom Kemp
I appreciate the offer. I put it forth to my Boss and the other Tech on this project. I don't think that they should give up on this yet...but they think otherwise. If I can manage to convince them to go forward, I will take you up on your offer. If, in fact, they do choose to give it another

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Something better than Declude

2002-11-13 Thread Sean Fahey
. -Original Message- From: Tom Kemp [mailto:KempT;controlconceptsinc.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 8:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Something better than Declude I appreciate the offer. I put it forth to my Boss and the other Tech on this project

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Something better than Declude..transferred from Imail forum

2002-11-12 Thread Tom Kemp
I'm moving this discussion into the Declude forum, where it belongs... Markus Gufler stated: I'm not sure if this is per-user-.self-config-frontend is really needed for declude. Our users are very happy when we try to find a good and reliable configuration and keep them up to date. (spammers

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Something better than Declude..transferred from Imail forum

2002-11-12 Thread John Tolmachoff
If we filter what we know is junk, somebody in upper management will get upset because they missed their latest 'junk' mail. That is why we wanted a per-user type of interface...so that those people can manage their own junk. Actually, what you may want to try is the attach function, which

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Something better than Declude..transferred from Imail forum

2002-11-12 Thread Tom Kemp
: [Declude.JunkMail] Something better than Declude..transferred from Imail forum If we filter what we know is junk, somebody in upper management will get upset because they missed their latest 'junk' mail. That is why we wanted a per-user type of interface...so that those people can manage their own junk

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Something better than Declude..transferred from Imail forum

2002-11-12 Thread John Tolmachoff
You're going to force me into looking into this situation closer, aren't you? I've been tempted...just trying to finish up a couple of other things before I do that. Yes. :)) Help is here. John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA IT Manager, Network Engineer RelianceSoft, Inc. Fullerton, CA 92835

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Something better than Declude..transferred from Imail forum

2002-11-12 Thread Glenn \\ WCNet
Kemp To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 3:14 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Something better than Declude..transferred from Imail forum Thanks, that is actually the avenue that they were taking. They got themessages to appear with the changed headers

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Something better than Declude..transferred from Imail forum

2002-11-12 Thread Tom Kemp
PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Something better than Declude..transferred from Imail forum ... they apparently were having issues where those filters were affecting either people's email accounts that weren't on the list yet, they were getting each others messages