Frolick
ArgoNet, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Madscientist
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 3:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] What do you think of this?
| >S_N_R BOOL (SPAMCOP * REVDNS) 9000
| >
| &
| >S_N_R BOOL (SPAMCOP * REVDNS) 9000
| >
| >...
| >
| >What about that?
|
| It would certainly work. The question in my mind, though, is
| how useful
| would this be? Is this something that would commonly be
| used? I think
| that with the weighting system, the value of Boolean test
>S_N_R BOOL (SPAMCOP * REVDNS) 9000
>
>...
>
>What about that?
It would certainly work. The question in my mind, though, is how useful
would this be? Is this something that would commonly be used? I think
that with the weighting system, the value of boolean test logic is less
than it
l 26, 2002 12:51 PM
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] What do you think of this?
|
|
|
| >Would it be possible create a boolean test that we could configure,
| >basically a if/then kind of thing?
| >
| >ex:
| >if SPAMCOP and REVDNS then weight = 9000
|
| Th
>Would it be possible create a boolean test that we could configure,
>basically a if/then kind of thing?
>
>ex:
>if SPAMCOP and REVDNS then weight = 9000
That's something that we have given some thought to, but were never sure
how useful it would actually be (given all the combinations of t
