Ta-dah! Easy as world peace.
Andrew 8)
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Nick
Hayer
Sent: Saturday, March 04, 2006 1:13 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] spf breaks email forwarding -
Matt wr
Hi Sandy
Sanford Whiteman wrote:
Andrew, I like your workaround with the Program Alias. However, I
think that instead, if people are willing to wait a few weeks to a
month, I can find time to put out a full-fledged external test for
Declude that does much the same thing,
D*.SMD file (which can be any filename) you can just
call:
smtp32.exe Qxxx.SMD and IMail will queue it up
immediately.
Ta-dah! Easy as world peace.
Andrew 8)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick
HayerSent: Saturday, March 04, 2006 1:13 PMTo:
t call:
smtp32.exe Qxxx.SMD and
IMail will queue it up immediately.
Ta-dah! Easy as world peace.
Andrew 8)
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Nick
Hayer
Sent: Saturday, March 04, 2006 1:13 PM
To: Declude
I think the underlying problem as has been discussed on this list is that an
SPF FAIL should not be relied upon as an outright rejection, rather used as
part of a weighting system.
John T
eServices For You
Seek, and ye shall find!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm not aware of any mail server that supports the Sender Rewriting
Scheme. It's certainly a fine idea, but the real issue is that the SPF
implementation has issues with forwarded E-mail, and they are seeking to
have mail servers correct their shortcoming. It may be a very long-time
in
The problem is not anything I am doing - it with SPF itself. By design
forwarded email will bounce if the receiving MTA is configed that way.
Even if I whitelist the emails they will bounce...
Let me explain -
user@Adelphia.net send an email to
user@greenmountainhealth.com which is an alias
Real-world issues include working around bad implementation, such as
surfglobal.net not configuring their server to reject messages that
fail SPF.
SPF has many real-world issues. SRS is novel, but it is impractical
since no one supports it (that I am aware of), and it certainly won't
be
Nick,
What I've done, and I can't be sure its working, is to set up my client's
SPF records like this:
v=spf1 ip4:[my ip mx range] ip4:[client ip mx range] mx ~all
The range format is nnn.nnn.nnn.nnn/nn
I haven't had complaints about SPF rejects.
George
-Original Message-
From:
@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] spf breaks email forwarding -
The problem is not anything I am doing - it with SPF itself. By design
forwarded email will bounce if the receiving MTA is configed that way.
Even if I whitelist the emails they will bounce...
Let me explain -
user
Matt wrote:
Real-world issues include working around bad implementation, such as
surfglobal.net not configuring their server to reject messages that
fail SPF.
SRS is a work around - and I'm simply asking if anyone has implemented
it on an Imail/Declude platform. Kindly stay on topic I
Hayer
Sent: Saturday, March 04, 2006 12:27 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail]
spf breaks email forwarding -
The problem is not anything I am doing - it with SPF
itself. By design forwarded email will bounce if the receiving MTA is configed
that way. Even if I
Someone could write a plug-in or Declude could be modified to handle
this, or IMail could be modified to handle this (and then Declude would
probably need to be updated to handle what IMail changed).
Why implement a work around in a standards compliant platform in order
to deal with a flawed
Hear hear.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Saturday, March 04, 2006 4:36 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] spf breaks email forwarding -
Someone could write a plug
14 matches
Mail list logo
