Markus,
I've found myself that the subject test is only slightly useful in the
scheme of things, but while I know a false positives will happen, I
haven't seen any under that configuration in the last day. I've now
stopped monitoring that test as a result. BTW, it's very good to know
that
Do you this in addition to or in replace of the tested listed earlier.
GibberishSub.txt
- Original Message -
From: Matthew Bramble [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 2:41 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Gibberish body detector + inline Base64
I've
Frederick Samarelli wrote:
Do you this in addition to or in replace of the tested listed earlier.
It's completely separate from the GIBBERSUB filter. I updated the list
of keywords in the subject filter so that it is the same as the one I
just posted after finding FP's on the acronym 'QE'EG
Thanks
- Original Message -
From: Matthew Bramble [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 5:15 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Gibberish body detector + inline Base64
Frederick Samarelli wrote:
Do you this in addition to or in replace of the tested
Thanks Josh. I'm sure there are more exceptions to come as well, but
hopefully only a handful. BTW, I did whitelist declude.com, so no
problems here with reading anything just as long as Scott doesn't start
using these filters with a high score :) Your message also
definitively answered the
Someone pointed me to a problem with PGP that needs to be fixed with
this filter, and there are still some other issues as well. This is
still a filter in progress.
I have another false positive that I just caught from an inline image
that didn't trip the BASE64 filter or contain the
Matt,
How well does this work.
BODY -5 CONTAINS attachment
I noticed it did not counter weight a photo attachment.
Fred
- Original Message -
From: Matthew Bramble [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 2:41 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Gibberish
Fred,
That was referenced in my last post. I'm trying to figure out the best
counterweight method. That should only happen with an inline attached
file (images can be sent both ways). Someone gave me a good
recommendation for a fix and I'm researching it. There's other FP's
that while
On Sep 12, 2003, at 10:15 PM, Frederick Samarelli wrote:
Matt,
How well does this work.
BODY -5 CONTAINS attachment
I noticed it did not counter weight a photo attachment.
I think what would help this filter and others like it would be if
Scott could make it so you could have a line in a
