[Declude.JunkMail] GLOBAL.BAK No Longer Shared?

2004-02-24 Thread Dan Geiser
Kami, I noticed that your current GLOBAL.BAK file is 0 bytes. Are you no longer sharing the contents of that file with others? Just Curious, Dan Geiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Sign up for virus-free and spam-free e-mail with

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] GLOBAL.BAK No Longer Shared?

2004-02-24 Thread Kami Razvan
Oh Oh... We are... I just wasn't aware of it.. Let me check.. Check back in a minute.. Kami -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Geiser Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2004 10:52 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Declude.JunkMail]

[Declude.JunkMail] OT Plaxo.com

2004-02-24 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Any one have any comments on them, good or bad? A client is asking about it. John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT Plaxo.com

2004-02-24 Thread Robert Grosshandler
No problems here. I use it, not extensively. Rob -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists) Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2004 10:41 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT Plaxo.com Any one have any comments

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT Plaxo.com

2004-02-24 Thread Dan Geiser
John, If I knew then (when I first tried Plaxo) what I know now (when I discovered some bothersome issues and have since uninstalled) I would never have installed Plaxo. The 2 things that leap to mind: 1) Plaxo installs a stub program on your computer which constantly runs in the background.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT Plaxo.com

2004-02-24 Thread Joshua Levitsky
- Original Message - From: John Tolmachoff (Lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2004 11:40 AM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT Plaxo.com Any one have any comments on them, good or bad? A client is asking about it. We ban them at work. Seems to us

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Outlook Cmdspace

2004-02-24 Thread R. Scott Perry
I just noticed that some Outlook clients are triggering CMDSPACE. Yes, it does appear that some mail clients are triggering CMDSPACE. However, if local users are whitelisted, it should take care of the problem. -Scott --- Declude JunkMail: The

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT Plaxo.com

2004-02-24 Thread Joshua Levitsky
- Original Message - From: Dan Geiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2004 12:31 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT Plaxo.com If I knew then (when I first tried Plaxo) what I know now (when I discovered some bothersome issues and have since uninstalled) I would never

[Declude.JunkMail] Is it better to ...

2004-02-24 Thread John Carter
I know it is best to handle mail based on test results, but ... for those FROM addresses we wish to block (the Flowgo's and the like), is it better to: 1 - put in the Imail kill file and return the 501 message, or 2 - accept the message, but then delete before delivery and not send the 501

[Declude.JunkMail] HOP HIGH / Spam Tests

2004-02-24 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
We are setup currently using HOPHIGH 1. With using a HOPHIGH setting of 1. What we are seeing is an increase in messages that are gettng caught with XBL, DSBL, SORBS, and other tests along this line on the second HOP even though they were legit messages that were sent through normal ISP

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT Plaxo.com

2004-02-24 Thread Matt
What concerns me is how they intend to make money. Consider the fact that they aren't making it directly from their software, hopefully there's a plan there that first requires acceptance and mass, though whether or not that would go over will with those here is a different story. I wouldn't

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HOP HIGH / Spam Tests

2004-02-24 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
Matt, Thats actually a very good idea I am going to incorporate. How did you come up with the scoring balance between first and second hop? Darrell Matt writes: You need to segment your tests between Spamtraps/Zombies/Relays and Static Sources. Static sources such as SBL should have no

[Declude.JunkMail] Log question

2004-02-24 Thread Scott Fisher
I've noticed the tests HOUR and IPNOTINMX are preceded by an n in mylogs, such as nHOUR and nIPNOTINMX. 02/23/2004 00:00:39 Q97050a10012a50e6 CBL:6 DSBL:6 XBL:7 SORBS-DUHL:5 SPAMCOP:9 NOABUSE:2 NOPOSTMASTER:1 CMDSPACE:8 nHOUR:1 SUBJECTCHARS:1 SNIFFER-SNAKEOIL:13 . Total weight = 59.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Log question

2004-02-24 Thread R. Scott Perry
I've noticed the tests HOUR and IPNOTINMX are preceded by an n in mylogs, such as nHOUR and nIPNOTINMX. That means that the a weight was applied because an E-mail did *not* fail the test. HOURhour6 20 0 1 IPNOTINMX ipnotinmx x x

[Declude.JunkMail] Yahoo, Sendmail to test antispam system

2004-02-24 Thread Sheldon Koehler
Anyone have any comments on how effective this will be (or not...)? http://news.com.com/2100-1032_3-5164279.html?tag=nefd_top Sheldon Sheldon Koehler, Owner/Partnerhttp://www.tenforward.com Ten Forward Communications 360-457-9023 Nationwide access, neighborhood support!

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Yahoo, Sendmail to test antispam system

2004-02-24 Thread Rick Klinge
Kinda brakes forwarding doesn't it? Isn't this that SPF stuff? ~Rick -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sheldon Koehler Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2004 4:31 PM - FamHost To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Yahoo,

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HOP HIGH / Spam Tests

2004-02-24 Thread Matt
As long as DYNA, DUL or DUHL (v1.78) appears anywhere in the name, Declude will only use that test on the last hop scanned. I chose to name my DUL tests with DUL and reserved the DYNA marker for this use so that it was easier for me to understand. Note that if you are using any whitelists,

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HOP HIGH / Spam Tests

2004-02-24 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
Matt, For the dyna/dul tests I though the test name had to end with either DYNA or DUL. I noticed you use (DYNA) - does it (declude) just look for the work dyna or dul to limit it to one hop? Darrell Matt writes: I basically came up with a rule where the (DYNA) test gets 3/4 to 2/3 of

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Yahoo, Sendmail to test antispam system

2004-02-24 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Provided you do not turn off the firewall once SP2 is applied. That is correct, turn off. SP2 is purported to turn on the firewall by default. John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL

[Declude.JunkMail] What's up with the logging in v1.78i3?

2004-02-24 Thread Bill Landry
I thought I would try out Declude v1.78i3 and what a drastic change there is to the logging, at least at the high level. It outputs to one long space delimited line. Scott, is that an intentional change? Bill --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Yahoo, Sendmail to test antispam system

2004-02-24 Thread Matt
Web scripts come to mind as an obvious exception that probably won't be covered by this. I'm not concerned about this though...Bill Gates said that he would solve the spam problem by 2005...right after they figure out how to stop viruses of course... Matt Matt Robertson wrote:

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] What's up with the logging in v1.78i3?

2004-02-24 Thread R. Scott Perry
I thought I would try out Declude v1.78i3 and what a drastic change there is to the logging, at least at the high level. It outputs to one long space delimited line. Scott, is that an intentional change? Doesn't it look better that way? :) Seriously, though, v1.78i4 at

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Yahoo, Sendmail to test antispam system

2004-02-24 Thread Matt Robertson
Anyone have any comments on how effective this will be (or not...)? What good is this if *everyone* doesn't use it? Matt Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSB Designs, Inc. http://mysecretbase.com ---

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HOP HIGH / Spam Tests

2004-02-24 Thread Matt
I basically came up with a rule where the (DYNA) test gets 3/4 to 2/3 of the points, and the (ALL) test gets 1/4 to 1/3 of the points. To air on the side of caution, I would step the points up on the (DYNA) test until it reached 3/4 and then I would add another point to the (ALL) test, i.e. 3

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Yahoo, Sendmail to test antispam system

2004-02-24 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
Actually, Bill announced today at the RAS conference that Windows XP SP2 should fix the virus issue. Beyond the Windows service release, Gates also showed off ``active protection technologies'' that will gird Windows computers against attacks by sensing changes in the network that indicate

[Declude.JunkMail] Fw: [Full-Disclosure] Scans for IPSwitch IMail LDAP vuilnerability

2004-02-24 Thread Joshua Levitsky
Please everyone be sure to patch your IMail 8 installations with the hotfix for the LDAP vulnerability. - Original Message - From: 3APA3A [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2004 11:19 AM Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Scans for IPSwitch IMail LDAP